|
|
||||||||
1 Departments of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 2 Cancer Biology, and 3 Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Respiratory epithelium
expresses nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) continuously in vivo; however,
mechanisms responsible for its expression are only partially
understood. We definitively identify an autocrine mechanism of
induction and maintenance of NOS2 in human airway epithelial cells
through the synthesis and secretion of a soluble mediator. Short
exposure of human airway cells to interferon (IFN)-
leads to
prolonged NOS2 expression. Transfer of the overlying culture medium
(conditioned medium) induces NOS2 expression in other airway epithelial
cells, suggesting the presence of an intermediary substance regulating
NOS2 expression in an autocrine loop. Characterization of the soluble
mediator reveals that it is stable and transferable in conditioned
medium for up to 7 days. However, soluble mediator does not induce NOS2 mRNA in human alveolar macrophages, indicating that the response to
soluble mediator is unique to human respiratory epithelium. Soluble
mediator is heat labile but is not inactivated by acid treatment,
unlike IFN-
itself. Importantly, IFN regulatory factor-1, which is
critical for murine NOS2 expression, is expressed and activated by
soluble mediator through the signal transducer and activator of
transcription-1-dependent pathway. Based on these findings, we propose
novel regulatory mechanisms for NOS2 expression in human airway epithelium.
lung; nitric oxide; inflammatory mediators; gene regulation; signal transduction
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NITRIC OXIDE (NO) has been proposed as a mediator of vital biological functions in the lung, including modifying airway tone, regulating pulmonary vascular tone, stimulating mucin secretion, modulating mucociliary clearance through effects on ciliary beat frequency, and immune surveillance for tumoricidal and bactericidal effects (25). Furthermore, NO mediates inflammatory responses relevant to host defense mechanisms and perhaps to lung injury and edema (25). Three types of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme responsible for endogenous NO production, have been described in human cells: inducible NOS (NOS2), which produces high levels of NO, and two constitutive NOSs, which produce low levels of NO (27, 28).
NO is detected in exhaled air of all individuals in a pattern
localizing formation of NO to airways (23). We have shown previously that normal human airway epithelial cells (HAEC) in vivo
produce NO through the continuous expression of NOS2 (7). Expression of NOS2 mRNA and protein is detected in epithelial cells in
the normal, noninflamed upper and lower airway by a variety of
techniques, including Northern blotting, in situ hybridization, Western
blotting, and immunohistochemistry (13, 14). The
continuous NOS2 expression in HAEC is in contrast to other cell types
that do not express NOS2 unless induced by cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-
, interleukin (IL)-1
, and/or tumor necrosis factor
(TNF)-
(20, 28). Although human airway epithelium
expresses abundant levels of NOS2 in vivo, culture of the human airway
cells ex vivo leads to loss of NOS2 gene expression (7).
These findings suggest that the control of NOS2 expression in human
airway epithelium is dependent on a combination of in vivo factor(s) or
exposures to which airway epithelial cells are uniquely responsive.
However, the mechanisms responsible for maintenance of expression are
not fully understood. We have previously demonstrated that a
combination of IFN-
and IL-4, which occur naturally in the lung
epithelial lining fluid, stimulates prolonged expression of NOS2 in
human airway epithelium and is important for maintaining the continuous expression of NOS2 through a protein synthesis-dependent mechanism (8). In the present study, we show that a 1-h incubation
of HAEC with IFN-
alone followed by removal of IFN-
by washing and further incubation in fresh medium without cytokines induces prolonged NOS2 expression for at least up to 6 days. Transfer of the
overlying culture medium induces NOS2 expression in other HAEC. These
unusual patterns of induction have led us to reason that IFN-
induces NOS2 in human airway epithelium by an autocrine loop
mediated by an unknown soluble mediator. We describe and characterize
the soluble mediator responsible for the induction and maintenance of
NOS2 expression in HAEC and investigate the mechanisms regulating expression.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary HAEC and Alveolar Macrophages
HAEC and alveolar macrophages (AM) were obtained through bronchoscopy with a flexible fiber-optic bronchoscope (Olympus BS-IT10; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) from normal nonsmoking volunteers with no history of lung disease and no medications. Informed consent was obtained under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board at Cleveland Clinic Foundation. For some experiments, HAEC were isolated from surgical specimens of tracheae and main bronchi as previously described (3). Bronchoscopic brush samplings of airway epithelial cells were taken from second- and third-order bronchi as previously described (7). For the preparation of AM, the tip of the bronchoscope was wedged into the right middle lobe or into the lingula. A total of 300 ml of saline was instilled by gravity in 50-ml aliquot portions and was withdrawn by gentle aspiration. Lavage fluid was passed through a blood filter (Baxter Scientific Products, Chicago, IL), and the cells were washed with Hanks' balanced salt solution (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY). Cell number was determined on a hemocytometer, and differential cell counts were performed with a modified Wright's stain (Hema-3 stain; Biochemical Sciences, Bridgeport, NJ).Cell Culture and Treatments
HAEC obtained by bronchial brushing were cultured in serum-free Lechner and LaVeck medium (LHC-8; Biofluids, Rockville, MD) on plates precoated with coating medium containing 29 µg/ml collagen (Invitrogen; Palo Alto, CA), 10 µg/ml BSA (Biofluids), and 10 µg/ml fibronectin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) for 5 min (7). The cells were passaged at 60-80% confluence by dissociation from plates with 0.02% trypsin (E-PET, Biofluids), which was neutralized with soybean trypsin inhibitor (Biofluids). Primary cultures of passages 0-2 were used in experiments. The epithelial nature of primary and cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytochemical staining as previously described (7). AM were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO BRL) supplemented with 5% human AB serum (Gemini, Calabasas, CA), L-glutamine, and antibiotics. Macrophages were plated and allowed to adhere for 1 h. Nonadherent cells were removed by washing with warm RPMI. The adherent cell population was >99% AM. BEAS-2B and BET-1A cells (24), human bronchial cell lines transformed by Ad12-SV40 virus and SV40 T antigen, respectively, were cultured in serum-free LHC-8 with the additives 0.33 nM retinoic acid and 2.75 µM epinephrine on precoated plates similar to HAEC. A549 cells, an epithelial cell line derived from lung adenocarcinoma (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), were cultured in MEM (GIBCO) with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin (8).Human IFN-
was a gift from Genentech (South San Francisco, CA) or
was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).
RNA Extraction and Northern Analysis
Total RNA was extracted and evaluated by Northern analysis as previously described using a 32P-labeled 1.9-kb NOS2 cDNA probe (pCCF21) or as a control 2-kb
-actin cDNA probe (pHF
A-1)
(7, 8) and then subjected to autoradiography. Expression
of NOS2 mRNA relative to
-actin mRNA was accomplished using a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Western Analysis
Cell lysate was prepared by freeze-thaw of cells, cultured for the indicated times with IFN-
or the conditioned medium, and isolated in buffer [3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin and pepstatin A, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
(PMSF), 1% NP-40 and 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.5]. Total protein was measured
by bicinchoninic protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Primary
antibodies used for Western analyses included a rabbit polyclonal
antibody directed against the COOH-terminal 10 amino acids of human
NOS2 (NO53; Merck, Rahway, NJ) (21) and anti-IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA). Total proteins were separated by 6 and 10% SDS-PAGE under
denaturing and reducing conditions for NOS2 and IRF-1,
respectively. Signal detection was accomplished using a
peroxidase-linked species-specific donkey anti-rabbit secondary
antibody (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham). The images of signals were electronically
digitalized by scanning, and the intensity of images was quantitated
with the software ImageQuant version 1.2 (Molecular Dynamics).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Whole cell extracts were prepared by a modification of a previously described method (5). In brief, adherent cells were harvested by a cell lifter, and the cell suspensions were centrifuged, washed with PBS, and resuspended in ice-cold low-salt buffer (in mM): 10 HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 MgCl2, 10 KCl, 0.5 PMSF, and 0.5 DTT. After a 5-min incubation on ice, cells were washed in the same buffer and then pelleted. A volume of high-salt extraction buffer equal to the volume of the cell pellet was added (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) and the mixture was placed on ice for 30 min. Whole cell extracts were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4°C. The protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic protein assay (Pierce).For electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) experiments, the
IFN-
activation site oligonucleotide
(5'-tcgaGCCTGATTTCCCCGAAATGACGGC-3') (22) or the
multimerized hexamer probe (AAGTGA)4, originally used to clone IRF-1
(19), was used. These synthetic oligonucleotides were
either end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP by polynucleotide
kinase or fill-in labeled with [
-32P]dCTP by Klenow.
For binding reactions, whole cell extracts (5 µg of protein) were
incubated in 24 µl of total reaction volume containing 20 mM HEPES,
pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 60 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 4 mM
Tris · HCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.6 mM EDTA, 200 µg/ml BSA, and 2 µg
of poly(dI-dC) (Amersham) for 15 min at 4°C. The
32P-labeled oligonucleotide (0.2 ng, 2 × 105 counts/min) was then added to the reaction mixture and
incubated for 20 min at room temperature. To specifically identify
signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1 and IRF-1
proteins, 2-4 µg of rabbit anti-STAT1
polyclonal antibody or
rabbit anti-IRF-1 or IRF-2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were
added to the binding reaction mix and incubated for 30 min at 4°C
before the 32P-labeled oligonucleotide was added. The
reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 6%
polyacrylamide gel with 0.4× TBE buffer (36 mM Tris, 36 mM borate, and
8 µM EDTA) for STAT1 or a 4% polyacrylamide gel containing 50 mM
Tris · HCl, pH 7.5, 0.38 M glycine, and 2 mM EDTA for IRF-1.
The gels were dried and analyzed by autoradiography.
Characterization of Soluble Mediator in Conditioned Medium
Wash-off experiments.
After a 1-h incubation of human respiratory epithelial cells with
IFN-
, the cells were vigorously washed with HEPES-buffered saline to
remove residual IFN-
and cultured in fresh medium without cytokines.
After the indicated times, the overlying culture medium (conditioned
medium) was transferred to unstimulated fresh cells that were harvested
at 24 h for the detection of NOS2 by either Northern or Western
analysis. All IFN-
exposures were performed following this method of washoff.
Heat stability. To examine whether the soluble mediator in the overlying tissue culture medium was heat labile, the conditioned medium was heated at 95°C for 5-15 min. The heated conditioned medium was cooled on ice and resuspended in an equal volume of fresh LHC-8 medium. Respiratory epithelial cells were exposed to either control or heat-treated medium for 24 h, at which time the cells were harvested for Western and Northern analyses to detect NOS2 expression.
pH stability. To examine whether the soluble mediator in the conditioned medium was acid or base labile, the conditioned medium was adjusted to pH 2 or pH 10 with concentrated HCl or 40% saturated NaOH and maintained at 4°C for 2 h. The pH of the acid- or base-treated conditioned medium was readjusted to pH 7.4 with 40% saturated NaOH or concentrated HCl, sterilized by passage through a 0.45-µm filter and resuspended in an equal volume of fresh LHC-8 medium. Respiratory epithelial cells were exposed to either control or acid- or base-treated medium for 24 h, at which time the cells were harvested for Western analysis to detect NOS2 expression.
Ultrafiltration separations. The conditioned medium was filtered by using an Amicon centrifugal ultrafiltration device (Millipore, Bedford, MA) equipped with Amicon YM cellulose ultrafiltration membrane at 10-kDa molecular mass cutoff. Of the initial volume, 15 ml were concentrated to approximately 1.5 ml of final volume by centrifugation at 3,000 g. Retentate and filtrate were resuspended in an equal volume of fresh LHC-8 medium. Respiratory epithelial cells were exposed to either control or retentate or filtrate medium for 24 h, at which time the cells were harvested for Western analysis to detect NOS2 expression.
Statistical Analysis
Data in the text and figures are expressed as means ± SE.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prolonged NOS2 mRNA Expression in HAEC in Response to IFN-
were performed. After 1-h exposure to
IFN-
, the cells were washed and cultured in fresh medium in the
absence of IFN-
for 24 h to 6 days. HAEC were harvested to detect NOS2 mRNA by Northern analysis. IFN-
induced NOS2 mRNA in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
1A). Once exposed to IFN-
,
the NOS2 expression was unusually prolonged, with NOS2 mRNA present up
to 6 days after a single initiating stimulation with IFN-
(Fig.
1B). Taken together with previous work (8),
this prolonged pattern of induction has led us to reason that IFN-
induces and maintains NOS2 in HAEC through the synthesis and secretion
of an intermediary soluble mediator regulating NOS2 expression in an
autocrine signaling mechanism.
|
Transfer of Conditioned Medium to Other HAEC in Culture Induces NOS2 Gene Expression
After 1 h in the absence or the presence of IFN-
(10,000 U/ml), HAEC were washed and cultured in fresh medium without IFN-
for 2 or 6 days. At the same time that the cells were harvested for
evaluation of NOS2 mRNA, the overlying medium (conditioned medium) was
transferred to other HAEC or human AM. After 24 h, cells were
harvested to evaluate NOS2 mRNA by Northern analysis. Transient
exposure to IFN-
was sufficient to induce NOS2 mRNA expression in
HAEC up to 6 days (Fig. 2). Transfer of
the conditioned medium to other HAEC resulted in NOS2 mRNA induction
(Fig. 2). However, transfer of the conditioned medium to human AM did
not induce NOS2 mRNA (Fig. 2). Similarly, transfer of 6-day conditioned medium to other HAEC also induced NOS2 mRNA expression (Fig. 2). Taken
together, the characteristics of these responses strongly indicate that
the persistence of NOS2 expression in HAEC by IFN-
may depend on the
transferable soluble mediator in the conditioned medium.
|
Determination of Cell Type-Specific NOS2 mRNA Expression in Response to Transferable Soluble Mediator
To determine whether the conditioned medium induction of NOS2 is limited to primary HAEC or expandable to other kinds of lung cells, BEAS-2B cells were exposed to IFN-
(10,000 U/ml) for 1 h,
washed, and cultured in fresh medium without IFN-
for 48 h. NOS2 expression was evaluated by Northern analysis. The conditioned medium overlying BEAS-2B cells was transferred to other BEAS-2B, BET-1A, or A549 cells. After a 24-h exposure to conditioned medium, the
cells were harvested to detect NOS2 mRNA by Northern analysis. Unlike
HAEC, BEAS-2B cells did not express NOS2 in response to IFN-
stimulation (Fig. 3A).
Transfer of the conditioned medium did not induce NOS2 in BEAS-2B or
BET-1A cells but did induce NOS2 in A549 cells (Fig. 3A).
Similarly, the conditioned medium from BET-1A cells stimulated with
IFN-
(10,000 U/ml, 1 h, followed by washoff) did not induce
NOS2 in BET-1A or BEAS-2B cells but induced NOS2 in A549 cells (Fig.
3B). The conditioned medium derived from A549 cell cultures
(10,000 U/ml, 1 h, followed by washoff) induced higher levels of
NOS2 expression in other A549 cells than those induced by the direct
addition of IFN-
(Fig. 3C). Notably, the brisk induction
of NOS2 by conditioned medium in A549 did not occur if the cells had
been preexposed to IFN-
(data not shown), suggesting an
IFN-
-mediated mechanism for the refractoriness to conditioned
medium. Finally, conditioned medium derived from BEAS-2B, BET-1A, and
A549 cells induced NOS2 expression in HAEC but not in AM (Fig.
3C). Thus the production of the transferable soluble
mediator and the response to it are not unique to primary HAEC. BEAS-2B
and BET-1A cells have the potential to produce soluble mediator in the
conditioned medium in response to IFN-
, although these cells do not
respond to soluble mediator. Both HAEC and A549 cells express NOS2 in
response to soluble mediator. The findings are summarized in Fig.
3D. To perform in-depth analyses of the soluble mediator,
BEAS-2B cells were chosen for the production of large amounts of the
soluble mediator and A549 cells were used to evaluate the response to
it in the following experiments.
|
Soluble Mediator Is Relatively Stable and Transferable in the Conditioned Medium for up to 7 Days
To further understand the mechanism by which the soluble mediator is produced in the conditioned medium, BEAS-2B cells were stimulated with IFN-
at concentrations of 100, 1,000 and 10,000 U/ml
for 1 h, followed by washoff and culture in fresh medium for 2 or
7 days. After 2 or 7 days, the conditioned medium was transferred to
A549 cells. Cells were harvested 24 h later for evaluation of NOS2
mRNA expression. The conditioned medium induced NOS2 mRNA in proportion
to the increasing concentration of IFN-
(Fig.
4A), suggesting that the
soluble mediator is produced by IFN-
in a dose-dependent manner. The
7-day conditioned medium had a similar capacity to induce NOS2 mRNA as
the transfer of 2-day conditioned medium (Fig. 4B),
indicating that the soluble mediator is stable. BEAS-2B cells were
stimulated with IFN-
(10,000 U/ml) for 1 h, followed by washoff
and culture in the fresh medium for 1, 24, and 48 h, respectively.
The conditioned medium derived at each time was transferred to A549
cells, and cells were harvested 24 h later to detect NOS2 mRNA by
Northern analysis. The 24- and 48-h conditioned medium induced NOS2
mRNA. In contrast, the 1-h conditioned medium could not induce NOS2
mRNA, confirming that the generation and secretion of the transferable
soluble mediator are time dependent (data not shown).
|
NOS2 Protein Induction by the Conditioned Medium
To investigate NOS2 protein induction by the conditioned medium, BEAS-2B cells were incubated in the absence or the presence of IFN-
(1,000 or 10,000 U/ml) for 1 h, followed by washoff and culture in
fresh medium for 48 h. The conditioned medium was transferred to
A549 cells, and NOS2 protein induction was evaluated by Western analysis at 24 h. The conditioned medium-induced NOS2 protein was
compared with direct addition of IFN-
to A549. The conditioned medium induction of NOS2 was markedly higher than levels induced by
direct addition of IFN-
at concentrations of 1,000 or 10,000 U/ml
(Fig. 5). These results indicate that
IFN-
is not the primary mediator of NOS2 induction.
|
Characterization of Respiratory Epithelial Cell-Derived Soluble Mediator
BEAS-2B cells were incubated in the absence or the presence of IFN-
(1,000 and 10,000 U/ml) for 1 h, followed by washoff and culture in fresh medium for 48 h. The conditioned medium was serially diluted and transferred to A549 cells. After 24 h, the cells were harvested, and NOS2 protein was evaluated by Western analysis. The conditioned medium from BEAS-2B cells stimulated with
1,000 or 10,000 U/ml of IFN-
was clearly active for NOS2 expression
up to 4× and 32× dilution (Fig. 6). To
understand further the biochemical basis of the soluble mediator, heat
stability and pH stability were examined. Western and Northern analyses showed that the activity in the conditioned medium from BEAS-2B stimulated with 1,000 or 10,000 U/ml of IFN-
was completely
destroyed by heating for 5-15 min at 95°C (Fig.
7). Furthermore, unlike IFN-
, which is
90% inactivated by acid treatment at pH 2 for 2 h
(12), soluble mediator is not acid labile, retaining
62 ± 5% of its activity after 2 h of incubation at pH 2 (Fig. 8A). The base-treated
preparation was also active, retaining 52 ± 5% of its activity
(Fig. 8B). Ultrafiltration experiments showed that the
retentate by a membrane at 10-kDa molecular mass cutoff induced NOS2
protein 2.2 ± 0.4-fold higher than 2× diluted conditioned medium
(Fig. 9).
|
|
|
|
STAT1 Activation and IRF-1 Expression by the Conditioned Medium
Although the cellular signaling mechanisms by which cytokines induce the expression of NOS2 by human respiratory epithelial cells are complex (4, 15, 20), we have previously shown that the expression of NOS2 in HAEC is dependent on Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT1 signaling pathway (8). Nuclear factor (NF)-
B is important in NOS2 expression in A549 cells by mixture of cytokines such
as IFN-
, IL-1
, and TNF-
(17). Furthermore, IRF-1
is essential for NOS2 activation in murine macrophages (11,
17), although the role of IRF-1 in human epithelial NOS2 gene
expression is uncertain. To investigate the signaling mechanisms
underlying NOS2 expression by the conditioned medium, we examined
STAT1, IRF-1, and NF-
B activation. BEAS-2B cells were cultured in
the absence or the presence of IFN-
(10,000 U/ml) for 1 h,
washed off, and cultured for 48 h. The conditioned medium was
transferred to A549 cells. For comparison to the conditioned medium,
10,000 U/ml of IFN-
were directly added to A549 cells. Whole cell
extracts were prepared after 15 min to detect STAT1 activation by EMSA. The conditioned medium induced STAT1 activation, demonstrated by the
supershift with STAT1
antibody (Fig.
10). The level of STAT1 activation by
the conditioned medium was identical to that induced by direct addition
of IFN-
at 10,000 U/ml (Fig. 10). Similarly, A549 cells were
incubated with the conditioned medium or IFN-
(10,000 U/ml) and
harvested at 4 h to evaluate IRF-1 protein induction and
activation by Western analysis and EMSA, respectively. The conditioned
medium induced IRF-1 protein at levels similar to IFN-
(Fig.
11A). Furthermore,
conditioned medium activated IRF-1 binding to DNA (Fig.
11B). Specificity of IRF-1 in binding complexes was
confirmed by supershift with IRF-1 antibody. In contrast, the
conditioned medium had no significant effect on NF-
B activation (data not shown). STAT1 and IRF-1 activation by the conditioned medium
that is similar to IFN-
suggest that a respiratory
epithelial-derived cytokine is present in the conditioned medium.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The airway epithelium not only serves as a barrier to isolate the airway microenvironment from external stimuli but also communicates and regulates the function of neighboring cells, including adjacent airway epithelial cells, bronchial smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, mast cells, and inflammatory cells. It is well established that airway epithelial cells produce and release signaling molecules including proteins, small peptides, amino acids, nucleotides, fatty acid derivatives, and even dissolved gases such as NO and carbon monoxide (10).
We show here that the continuous NOS2 expression in human airway
epithelium in vivo is mediated through an autocrine signaling mechanism. The delayed and prolonged induction of NOS2 mRNA
in IFN-
-treated HAEC, which peaks at 24-48 h and
lasts up to at least 6 days, suggests the presence of a stable
intermediary soluble substance regulating the expression of NOS2.
Furthermore, persistence of NOS2 expression in HAEC in culture is
dependent on maintaining the overlying tissue culture medium containing
soluble mediator. Transfer of the soluble mediator to other HAEC
in culture induces NOS2 gene expression, whereas transfer of
soluble mediator to AM does not lead to NOS2 induction. In this
context, the soluble mediator is specific for human airway epithelium
and may help to explain the previous finding of NOS2 expression in HAEC
in vivo, without expression in other resident lung cells including human macrophages (7). In contrast, NOS2 mRNA could not be induced by the soluble mediator in the transformed human airway epithelial cell lines BEAS-2B and BET-1A, whereas they retain the
strong potential to produce soluble mediator in response to IFN-
.
Based on the knowledge that BEAS-2B and BET-1A cells express chemokines
and adhesion molecules in response to IFN-
(18, 26) and
have an intact IFN-
signaling pathway, a defect in a specific
receptor or signaling component is more likely the reason for lack of
NOS2 induction in response to soluble mediator. On the other hand,
defects in the NOS2 gene may also be present in these transformed
cells, which make a response to soluble mediator impossible.
Several facts regarding the soluble mediator emerge from this study.
First, the majority of the mediator synthesis or secretion occurs early
after initiating IFN-
stimulation. In contrast to known cytokines,
soluble mediator is stable and transferable in the overlying culture
medium, with full activity for at least 7 days. The soluble mediator is
an IFN-
-stimulated gene product and induces signaling events similar
to IFN-
. For example, STAT1 activation and IRF-1 induction and
activation by the soluble mediator are similar to induction and
activation by direct addition of high levels of IFN-
.
However, soluble mediator is not IFN-
as judged by several findings.
First, levels of NOS2 expression in HAEC by direct addition of IFN-
were markedly lower than those induced by the conditioned medium. In
fact, NOS2 induction in A549 cells by conditioned medium was greater
than that observed in the A549 cells from which the conditioned medium
was derived. Thus A549 cells producing soluble mediator were relatively
refractory to its effects, perhaps due to downregulation of receptor
and/or signaling pathways by IFN-
. Importantly, the soluble mediator retained its activity after acid treatment, whereas IFN-
is
inactivated under these conditions. Finally, IFN-
is not produced by
HAEC exposed to IFN-
in culture, and pretreatment with neutralizing antibodies to IFN-
does not affect the ability of conditioned medium
to induce NOS2 (8).
Based on our findings, we propose a novel mechanism for NOS2 induction
and maintenance in human airway epithelium in which IFN-
stimulates
epithelial production and secretion of a soluble mediator. We have
shown previously that activation of STAT is required for the
conditioned medium activation of NOS2, using an inhibitor of tyrosine
kinase (6). Thus soluble mediator induces airway
epithelial cells in an autocrine fashion to express NOS2, likely
through STAT1 activation and IRF-1 induction and activation (Fig.
12). Notably, the levels of IFN-
used in this study are within the levels found in human lung epithelial
lining fluid of healthy (~50 U/ml) or asthmatic (~125 U/ml)
individuals (6). Thus NOS2 expression in the human airway
in vivo may also be through this autocrine mechanism. Although NF-
B
activation is important in multiple cytokine induction in A549 cells
(15), NF-
B is not activated in human respiratory
epithelial cells by IFN-
or soluble mediator. This finding excludes
multiple known cytokines that signal through NF-
B as candidates for
soluble mediator, including IL-1, TNF, or IL-18. On the other hand,
STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation and translocation to the nucleus occur in response to soluble mediator and, indeed, to many growth factors and
cytokines including IL-10, IFN-
/
, epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor, IL-6, IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor,
ciliary neurotrophic factor, oncostatin M, growth hormone, prolactin,
and colony-stimulating factor 1 (2, 9, 16). Epidermal
growth factor and growth hormone are less likely candidates for soluble
mediator because airway epithelial cells are grown in medium containing
considerable levels of these humoral factors and yet do not express
NOS2 under basal culture conditions. IFN-
/
are
acid-stable interferons but are inhibitors of NOS2 induction in
epithelial cells (9) and thus are also not likely
candidates for soluble mediator. Similarly IL-10, a cytokine with
anti-inflammatory properties, inhibits NOS2 expression
(1). The STAT1 activation resulting from the conditioned
medium may be due to one of these known mediators or to an as yet
unidentified mediator. Nevertheless, in this study, we provide strong
evidence for the existence of an autocrine loop regulating NOS2
expression in the human airway through an IFN-
-inducible respiratory
epithelial cell-derived soluble mediator and define the signaling
events in response to the soluble mediator.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank C. C. Harris for BEAS-2B and BET-1A cells, J. L. Humes for anti-NOS2 (NO53) antibody, L. Kedes for pHF
A-1, Genentech for human IFN-
, and R. A. Dweik for assistance in bronchoscopic sampling of airways.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-60917.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. C. Erzurum, Dept. of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave./A90, Cleveland, OH 44195 (E-mail: erzurus{at}ccf.org).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 10 August 2000; accepted in final form 15 December 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Becherel, PA,
Le Goff L,
Ktorza S,
Ouaaz F,
Mencia-Huerta JM,
Dugas B,
Debre P,
Mossalayi MD,
and
Arock M.
Interleukin-10 inhibits IgE-mediated nitric oxide synthase induction and cytokine synthesis in normal human keratinocytes.
Eur J Immunol
25:
2992-2995,
1995[ISI][Medline].
2.
Darnell, JE, Jr,
Kerr IM,
and
Stark GR.
Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins.
Science
264:
1415-1421,
1994
3.
Davis, PB,
Silski CL,
Kercsmar CM,
and
Infeld M.
-Adrenergic receptors on human tracheal epithelial cells in primary culture.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
258:
C71-C76,
1990
4.
De Vera, ME,
Shapiro RA,
Nussler AK,
Mudgett JS,
Simmons RL,
Morris SM, Jr,
Billiar TR,
and
Geller DA.
Transcriptional regulation of human inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) gene by cytokines: initial analysis of the human NOS2 promoter.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
1054-1059,
1996
5.
Dignam, JD,
Lebovitz RM,
and
Roeder RG.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res
11:
1475-1489,
1983
6.
Guo, FH,
Comhair SAA,
Zheng S,
Dweik RA,
Eissa NT,
Thomassen MJ,
Calhoun W,
and
Erzurum SC.
Molecular mechanisms of increased nitric oxide (NO) in asthma: evidence for transcriptional and post-translational regulation of NO synthesis.
J Immunol
164:
5970-5980,
2000
7.
Guo, FH,
de Raeve HR,
Rice TW,
Stuehr DJ,
Thunnissen FB,
and
Erzurum SC.
Continuous nitric oxide synthesis by inducible nitric oxide synthase in normal human airway epithelium in vivo.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
7809-7813,
1995
8.
Guo, FH,
Uetani K,
Haque SJ,
Williams BR,
Dweik RA,
Thunnissen FB,
Calhoun W,
and
Erzurum SC.
Interferon gamma and interleukin 4 stimulate prolonged expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in human airway epithelium through synthesis of soluble mediators.
J Clin Invest
100:
829-838,
1997[ISI][Medline].
9.
Hill, CS,
and
Treisman R.
Transcriptional regulation by extracellular signals: mechanisms and specificity.
Cell
80:
199-211,
1995[ISI][Medline].
10.
Jacoby, DB.
Mediator functions of epithelial cells.
In: Asthma and Rhinitis, edited by Bruce WW,
and Holgate ST.. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1995, p. 573-583.
11.
Kamijo, R,
Harada H,
Matsuyama T,
Bosland M,
Gerecitano J,
Shapiro D,
Le J,
Koh SI,
Kimura T,
Green SJ,
Mak TW,
Taniguchi T,
and
Vilcek J.
Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages.
Science
263:
1612-1615,
1994
12.
Kleinschmidt, WJ,
and
Schultz RM.
Similarities of murine gamma interferon and the lymphokine that renders macrophages cytotoxic.
J Interferon Res
2:
291-299,
1982[ISI][Medline].
13.
Kobzik, L,
Bredt DS,
Lowenstein CJ,
Drazen J,
Gaston B,
Sugarbaker D,
and
Stamler JS.
Nitric oxide synthase in human and rat lung: immunocytochemical and histochemical localization.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
9:
371-377,
1993.
14.
Lundberg, JO,
Farkas-Szallasi T,
Weitzberg E,
Rinder J,
Lidholm J,
Anggaard A,
Hokfelt T,
Lundberg JM,
and
Alving K.
High nitric oxide production in human paranasal sinuses.
Nat Med
1:
370-373,
1995[ISI][Medline].
15.
Marks-Konczalik, J,
Chu SC,
and
Moss J.
Cytokine-mediated transcriptional induction of the human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene requires both activator protein 1 and nuclear factor kappaB-binding sites.
J Biol Chem
273:
22201-22208,
1998
16.
Marshall, CJ.
Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation.
Cell
80:
179-185,
1995[ISI][Medline].
17.
Martin, E,
Nathan C,
and
Xie QW.
Role of interferon regulatory factor 1 in induction of nitric oxide synthase.
J Exp Med
180:
977-984,
1994
18.
Mauck, KA,
and
Hosenpud JD.
The bronchial epithelium: a potential allogeneic target for chronic rejection after lung transplantation.
J Heart Lung Transplant
15:
709-714,
1996[ISI][Medline].
19.
Miyamoto, M,
Fujita T,
Kimura Y,
Maruyama M,
Harada H,
Sudo Y,
Miyata T,
and
Taniguchi T.
Regulated expression of a gene encoding a nuclear factor, IRF-1, that specifically binds to IFN-beta gene regulatory elements.
Cell
54:
903-913,
1988[ISI][Medline].
20.
Nathan, C,
and
Xie QW.
Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide.
J Biol Chem
269:
13725-13728,
1994
21.
Nicholson, S,
Bonecini-Almeida Md,
Lapa e Silva JR,
Nathan C,
Xie QW,
Mumford R,
Weidner JR,
Calaycay J,
Geng J,
Boechat N,
Linhares C,
Rom W,
and
Ho JL.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary alveolar macrophages from patients with tuberculosis.
J Exp Med
183:
2293-2302,
1996
22.
Pearse, RN,
Feinman R,
and
Ravetch JV.
Characterization of the promoter of the human gene encoding the high-affinity IgG receptor: transcriptional induction by gamma-interferon is mediated through common DNA response elements.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:
11305-11309,
1991
23.
Persson, MG,
Zetterstrom O,
Agrenius V,
Ihre E,
and
Gustafsson LE.
Single-breath nitric oxide measurements in asthmatic patients and smokers.
Lancet
343:
146-147,
1994[ISI][Medline].
24.
Reddel, RR,
Ke Y,
Gerwin BI,
McMenamin MG,
Lechner JF,
Su RT,
Brash DE,
Park JB,
Rhim JS,
and
Harris CC.
Transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells by infection with SV40 or adenovirus-12 SV40 hybrid virus, or transfection via strontium phosphate coprecipitation with a plasmid containing SV40 early region genes.
Cancer Res
48:
1904-1909,
1988
25.
Schmidt, HH,
and
Walter U.
NO at work.
Cell
78:
919-925,
1994[ISI][Medline].
26.
Stellato, C,
Beck LA,
Gorgone GA,
Proud D,
Schall TJ,
Ono SJ,
Lichtenstein LM,
and
Schleimer RP.
Expression of the chemokine RANTES by a human bronchial epithelial cell line. Modulation by cytokines and glucocorticoids.
J Immunol
155:
410-418,
1995[Abstract].
27.
Stuehr, DJ,
and
Griffith OW.
Mammalian nitric oxide synthases.
Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol
65:
287-346,
1992[ISI][Medline].
28.
Szabo, C,
and
Thiemermann C.
Regulation of the expression of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase.
Adv Pharmacol
34:
113-153,
1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Zheng, W. Xu, S. Bose, A. K. Banerjee, S. J. Haque, and S. C. Erzurum Impaired nitric oxide synthase-2 signaling pathway in cystic fibrosis airway epithelium Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): L374 - L381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. M. Ricciardolo, P. J. Sterk, B. Gaston, and G. Folkerts Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease of the Respiratory System Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 731 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xu, S. A. A. Comhair, S. Zheng, S. C. Chu, J. Marks-Konczalik, J. Moss, S. J. Haque, and S. C. Erzurum STAT-1 and c-Fos interaction in nitric oxide synthase-2 gene activation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): L137 - L148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Pitt and C. M. St. Croix Complex Regulation of iNOS in Lung Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2002; 26(1): 6 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||