|
|
||||||||
Departments of Medicine and Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, College of Physicians and Surgeons and St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York, New York 10019
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although alveoli clear liquid by active transport, the presence of surface-active material on the alveolar surface suggests that convective mechanisms for rapid liquid removal may exist. To determine such mechanisms, we held the isolated blood-perfused rat lung at a constant alveolar pressure (PA). Under videomicroscopy, we micropunctured a single alveolus to infuse saline or Ringer solution in ~10 adjacent alveoli. Infused alveoli were lost from view. However, as the infused liquid cleared, the alveoli reappeared and their diameters could be quantified. Hence the time-dependent determination of alveolar diameter provided a means for quantifying the time to complete liquid removal (Ct) in single alveoli. All determinations were obtained at an PA of 5 cmH2O. Ct, which related inversely to alveolar diameter, averaged 4.5 s in alveoli with the fastest liquid removal. Injections of dye-stained liquid revealed that the liquid flowed from the injected alveoli to adjacent air-filled alveoli. Lung hyperinflations instituted by cycling PA between 5 and 15 cmH2O decreased Ct by 50%. Chelation of intracellular Ca2+ prolonged Ct and abolished the inflation-induced enhancement of liquid removal. We conclude that when liquid is injected in a few alveoli, it rapidly flows to adjacent air-filled alveoli. The removal mechanisms are dependent on alveolar size, inflation, and intracellular Ca2+. We speculate that removal of liquid from the alveolar surface is determined by the curvature and surface-active properties of the air-liquid interface.
surfactant; pulmonary edema; cell calcium; Laplace equation; inflation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IN PULMONARY EDEMA, the failure of gas exchange results from alveolar liquid accumulation. Alveoli are capable of removing the liquid, although the only known removal mechanism is by active salt transport across the alveolar membrane (4). However, active transport mechanisms are slow, effecting liquid transport with a time course of hours. Faster mechanisms of alveolar liquid removal that are protective in the early stages of pulmonary edema may coexist but remain unidentified.
We considered the possibility that surface-active forces in the alveolus effect rapid convective removal of alveolar liquid. Although airway continuity provides a potential route for convective liquid removal from the alveoli to the distal airways, potential flow-supportive forces remain unidentified. Nevertheless, classic evidence for the formation of edema foam in the airway (18) and nonuniform alveolar liquid accumulation (20) suggests that alveolar-airway liquid flow exists in early pulmonary edema. However, such flows have not been directly confirmed.
Classically, the distribution of alveolar liquid forces is understood on the basis of the Laplace equation for curved surfaces (3, 12, 19). However, it is not clear that air-liquid interface curvatures undergo sufficient alterations in alveolar liquid filling as to generate convective forces for alveolar liquid removal. We considered that if convective mechanisms exist, then liquid should drain rapidly from a filled alveolus. On the other hand, lack of convection should be evident in the retention of alveolar liquid to the extent that it is slowly removed by active transport. We tested this hypothesis by microinjecting liquid into small groups of alveoli on the surface of the constantly inflated lung. Our findings indicate that alveoli thus filled eject the liquid in seconds, thereby indicating the existence of a novel convective mechanism for alveolar liquid removal.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lung microscopy. The isolated blood-perfused rat lung was prepared as previously described (2). Briefly, lungs excised from anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats were pump perfused with autologous rat blood at 14 ml/min at 37°C. Pulmonary arterial and left atrial pressures were held at 10 and 5 cmH2O, respectively. At baseline, the lungs were constantly inflated at an alveolar pressure (PA) of 5 cmH2O. The lungs were positioned on a vibration-free table and superfused with saline at 37°C to prevent drying. The lung surface was viewed through a stereomicroscope (SZH, Olympus) as previously described (2), and images taken with a microscope-mounted video camera (T123A CDD camera, NEC) connected to a video timer (VTG-33, FOR.A Company) were displayed on a video monitor (PM-127 REK.B, Ikegami). All images were recorded with a videocassette recorder (BR-S378U, JVC) at 30 frames/min.
Alveolar microinjection. For each imaged alveolus, the microscope focus was set at the maximum alveolar diameter. For alveolar micropuncture and microinfusion, we used previously described methods (2). Briefly, we prepared beveled glass micropipettes with a tip diameter of 5 µm. We backfilled each micropipette with the injection solution, and then, using a micropipette manipulator (Leitz), we micropunctured single alveoli that we viewed with a stereomicroscope and microinfused it with saline (0.9% sodium chloride injection USP) or Ringer solution (pH 7.4; lactated Ringer injection USP, B.BRAUN Medical) for 1-2 s to fill ~10 adjacent alveoli. After microinfusion, the micropipette was withdrawn, and the alveoli were imaged. No alveolus was punctured more than once.
Quantification of liquid removal. Before alveolar microinjection, we quantified diameters of several alveoli in the imaged field as the means of the longest and the shortest diameters in each alveolus. After microinfusion, loss of visible alveolar margins denoted alveolar liquid filling. As the microinfused liquid drained away from each alveolus, the alveolar margins became evident. Hence we quantified the liquid removal time (Ct) as the time elapsed from the end of alveolar filling to the appearance of 90% of the alveolar diameter. Ct was quantified first under baseline conditions at an PA of 5 cmH2O and then after a 1-min hyperinflation period in which the lungs were given 10 inflations by cycling PA between 5 and 15 cmH2O.
In separate groups, we quantified Ct in control alveoli that received liquid injections in the absence of pretreatment and in alveoli given a 15-min pretreatment with an infusion of 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid tetra(acetoxymethyl) ester (BAPTA-AM; 40 µM; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) in Ca2+-free HEPES solution or one of the inhibitors of active transport, ouabain (1 mM, pH 7.4) or amiloride (10 µM, pH 7.4; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Ca2+-free HEPES solution (pH 7.4, osmolarity of 295 mosM) contained (in mM) 20 HEPES, 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, and 10 glucose. The vehicle was lactated Ringer solution. Data are means ± SE shown in plots or means ± SD shown in text; n is the number of lungs. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rate of liquid removal.
Figure 1 exemplifies our alveolar
microinfusion procedure. It shows that the light-reflecting air-liquid
interface, which defined the alveolar margin under air-filled
conditions (baseline), was lost after liquid instillation (0 s) in the
marked region. Hence alveoli were not visible while liquid filled.
However, as depicted over time in Fig. 1, as the liquid drained away,
the alveolar margins became progressively evident.
|
|
|
Route of removal.
To determine the fate of the instilled liquid, we included fluorescent
latex beads (diameter 1 µm) in the alveolar microinfusion. Figure
4 shows that despite a constant
PA of 5 cmH2O, single beads showed
translational displacement out of the injected alveolus within 3-5
s and then continued along a trajectory of spontaneous movement across
alveoli for up to 80 s. To the extent that we could determine,
beads that exited a given alveolus moved in approximately the same
direction, indicating that their movements were not random but were
probably actuated by bulk flow out of the instilled alveolus.
|
|
Role of Ca2+.
To determine the role of intracellular Ca2+ as a
determinant of Ct, we treated alveoli with
20-min microinfusions of BAPTA-AM in Ca2+-free HEPES.
BAPTA-AM chelates intracellular Ca2+, and as Ashino et al.
(2) have previously shown, it blocks the
Ca2+ increases and surfactant secretion in type II cells of
intact alveoli. BAPTA-AM markedly prolonged Ct
under baseline conditions (P < 0.05), and it abrogated
the posthyperinflation reduction of Ct (Fig.
6). When we pretreated alveoli with
Ca2+-free HEPES solution alone, Ct
was not different from baseline. However, similar to the BAPTA-AM
experiments, Ca2+-free HEPES abrogated the
hyperinflation-induced decrease of Ct, indicating that the inflation effect was also dependent on external Ca2+. These findings indicate that
Ca2+-regulated processes determined
Ct, although the nonspecific effects of BAPTA-AM
may also have contributed to these results.
|
Ct and alveolar diameter.
Although all determinations were made at a constant PA of 5 cmH2O, Ct differed in different
alveoli. Under baseline conditions, Ct
correlated inversely with alveolar diameter (Fig.
7A), indicating a strong
dependence of the liquid removal rate on alveolar size. However, after
a period of cyclic hyperinflations in which PA was
increased to 15 cmH2O 10 times in 1 min, the correlation was lost (Fig. 7B), suggesting the involvement of
surfactant-dependent surface forces in the liquid removal (see
DISCUSSION). Similar to control, the inverse
Ct-alveolar diameter relationship was also
evident in BAPTA-AM-treated alveoli (Fig. 7C). However, different from control, hyperinflation failed to abolish the
relationship (Fig. 7D), indicating that the possible
inhibition of surfactant secretion by BAPTA-AM rescued the
Ct-diameter relationship.
|
Active transport.
Figure 8 summarizes the experiments in
which we determined the extent to which active transport plays a role
in the observed liquid removal. As shown, the active transport blockers
ouabain and amiloride failed to affect Ct at
either baseline or postinflation conditions, indicating that alveolar
liquid removal was not determined by active transport mechanisms across
the alveolar wall. In two experiments, we confirmed that the presence
of albumin (5% human albumin solution) in the injected liquid did not
affect Ct (data not shown), indicating that
protein osmotic pressures were not a factor in the removal.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We show here for the first time that in an air-filled lung, when a few alveoli become liquid filled, as might occur during the initiation of pulmonary edema (20), the alveoli rapidly eject the liquid. This was evident in our experiments in which we modeled the pattern of alveolar filling in early edema by microinjecting a single alveolus with Ringer lactate to fill 6-10 adjoining alveoli. In the immediate postinstillation period, the alveoli were lost from view because each liquid-filled alveolus lost its light-reflecting air-liquid interface that defines the alveolar margin and allows the alveolus to be visualized by light microscopy. However, although in the liquid-filled condition the alveoli were not discernible, each liquid-filled alveolus ejected its liquid load and became visible as it refilled with air.
The delay to reappearance of a liquid-filled alveolus provided a measure of the Ct that, although varying over a 10-fold range, occurred as rapidly as 5 s. In every case, alveolar reappearance was a rapid event such that each alveolus seemed to "pop" open as air replaced the instilled liquid. This was evident in the rapid rate at which the alveolar diameter regained its preinfusion value (Fig. 2C). In an overwhelming majority of experiments, the micropunctured alveolus was neither the first nor the last to clear liquid. In alveoli microinjected with Evans blue solution, no liquid leakage was evident (Fig. 5). These findings rule out the possibility that liquid leaked into the interstitium at the micropuncture site or elsewhere. Ouabain and amiloride, which are blockers of NaCl transport, failed to affect Ct, thereby ruling out active transport as the major underlying mechanism. Furthermore, in one experiment, Ct was not modified by the inclusion of albumin in the instilled Ringer lactate (5% human albumin solution), indicating that colloid osmotic forces did not determine removal. The dependence of Ct on alveolar size, shown in Fig. 7, rules out a gravitational effect on the removal. Hence, based on these considerations as well as on the rapidity of the removal, we interpret that the instilled liquid was removed convectively.
Although the mechanisms underlying this rapid removal of alveolar liquid remain unclear, alveolar surfactant is implicated by three findings. First, hyperinflation, which stimulates alveolar surfactant secretion (9, 14) decreased Ct. Ashino et al. (2) recently showed that even a single brief period of lung expansion induced alveolar surfactant secretion for a prolonged period. Hence it is possible that in the posthyperinflation period, alveoli were surfactant rich and that the faster liquid removal was attributable to enhancement of surface forces by hyperinflation-induced surfactant secretion.
Second, the intracellular Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM markedly prolonged Ct at baseline and also blocked the posthyperinflation decrease of Ct. Surfactant secretion is a Ca2+-dependent process (6, 8). Alveolar stretch due to lung expansion increases alveolar cell Ca2+ and thereby causes surfactant secretion (2, 8, 21). BAPTA-AM chelates intracellular free Ca2+ and prevents both the stretch-induced Ca2+ increase as well as the subsequent enhancement of surfactant secretion (2). If surfactant were responsible for the rapid liquid removal at baseline, then inhibition of surfactant secretion should delay the removal. Furthermore, the inhibition of surfactant secretion should block the hyperinflation effect of increasing surfactant in the alveolus and thereby further delaying liquid removal. Both predictions were supported by our findings that in BAPTA-AM-treated alveoli, Ct was almost two times higher than the control value and that hyperinflation failed to decrease Ct, indicating that the enhancement of liquid removal was blocked.
Third, depletion of extracellular Ca2+ also inhibited the posthyperinflation reduction of Ct. Because Ca2+ determines the organization and maintenance of tubular myelin (11), extracellular Ca2+ is an essential requirement for surfactant function. It is likely that the depletion of extracellular Ca2+ caused disruption of the lining and therefore loss of surface-active forces that may have driven the liquid flow.
In brief, we implicate surfactant in these findings because hyperinflation, a surfactant stimulant, speeded removal, whereas BAPTA-AM, an inhibitor of surfactant secretion, slowed removal. In addition, another important determining factor for removal was alveolar diameter. As predicted by the Laplace equation (see APPENDIX A), if the interfacial tension (T) and the air pressure (Pair) are constants, then the alveolar liquid pressure (Pliq) must increase as alveolar radius (r) increases. If Pliq is the force that convectively clears the liquid from the alveolus (see APPENDIX A), then we may expect a higher Pliq, hence faster removal in larger alveoli. The inverse Ct-alveolar diameter relationship in Fig. 7 supports this expectation.
Despite these considerations, other interpretations may apply to our data. For example, a different form of the Laplace equation may be valid (10). Also, the pores of Kohn that form potential interconnecting pathways between adjoining alveoli (5) could provide a route of liquid flow. Furthermore, a potential explanation may lie in a liquid equivalent of the phenomenon of air "pendulluft" in which out-of-phase airflow occurs between adjacent lung regions because of imbalances in airway impedance (13, 15, 17). Differences in impedance to liquid flow attributable to differences in alveolar diameter may account for the present patterns of liquid removal from instilled alveoli. Although we interpret the BAPTA-AM effects as being due to inhibition of surfactant secretion, other processes inhibited by intracellular Ca2+ chelation may have played a role. These issues require further investigation.
To determine the direction in which the alveolar liquid was removed, we instilled fluorescent latex beads. After instillation, single beads were evident as fluorescent spots and could be followed by time-based fluorescence microscopy. The fluorescent beads were expelled within 3-5 s from the instilled alveolus and, subsequently, continued to move spontaneously across four alveolar diameters for up to 90 s. The evidence for such spontaneous translation is consistent with the notion that the beads were convectively transported in the postinstillation period. A similar interpretation may be drawn from our experiments in which we instilled dye-labeled albumin solution. Here as well, convective flow was evident in that spread of the dye was evident as a spot of increasing perimeter on the lung surface. To the extent that the beads and the albumin solution marked the pattern of alveolar liquid removal, we interpret that the instilled alveolar liquid flowed out of the filled alveolus and then traversed several adjacent alveoli, possibly en route to the respiratory duct.
Using a micropuncture technique, Schurch et al. (16) deposited liquid droplets of different surface tensions on the alveolar surface. Droplets of low surface tension rapidly spread on the surface, whereas those of high surface tension tended to remain rounded, indicating that the balance between the alveolar surface pressure and the surface tension of the deposited liquid droplet was the critical determinant of surface wetting, hence droplet stability (7). In our experiments, the situation was somewhat different because we deposited not a droplet but a volume of liquid that filled the entire lumen of the injected alveolus. If the considerations of the droplet experiment of Schurch et al. (16) were applicable, then given the high surface tension of water, we would expect the injected liquid to remain as a stabilized drop. Because the liquid flowed away, we interpret that subinterfacial pressures generated by the Laplace considerations were the likely factor in this liquid removal.
In conclusion, our findings are the first evidence that alveoli are capable of rapidly ejecting instilled liquid, which indicates the presence of a novel liquid removal mechanism in the lung and suggests that in addition to active transport, alveoli possess the potential for convective removal. Staub microinjected a relatively large volume (1-2 µl) of dyed saline into subpleural alveoli and concluded that the liquid was removed by interstitial drainage (19). Our findings are different because, as we discuss above, the present liquid removal occurred by an intra-alveolar and not an interstitial route. Although the exact mechanisms need to be clarified, our findings indirectly implicate surface-active alveolar forces in the liquid removal. The physiological significance bears on the mechanisms by which alveoli may be protected from liquid filling in early stages of pulmonary edema. As alveoli begin to fill with liquid, rapid convection of the liquid away from the alveoli may be beneficial not only for maintaining liquid-free alveoli to protect gas exchange but also as a provision for washing out cells or particles that may have been deposited on the alveolar surface. The extent to which such a removal mechanism applies in later stages of pulmonary edema when a large number of alveoli become liquid filled remains uncertain. However, we believe that in early pulmonary edema when alveolar liquid entry is incipient and the alveoli are largely still air-filled, the present convective mechanisms may provide a crucial liquid elimination process from the gas exchange area.
| |
APPENDIX A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laplacian considerations.
Because convective flow occurs down a pressure gradient, we
considered the possibility that a flow-inducing pressure gradient develops between two adjacent alveoli when one of them becomes liquid
filled. This situation is illustrated in Fig.
9 in which a fully liquid-filled alveolus
(alveolus A) lies adjacent to an air-filled alveolus
(alveolus B). According to the Laplace equation as
classically applied to pressure distribution across the alveolar air-liquid interface (3, 12)
|
|
alveolus B.
| |
APPENDIX B |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because the manual determination of alveolar diameter by
microcalipers involved the subjective assessment of alveolar edge detection, we constructed a kappa statistic according to standard methods (1). Two observers determined whether alveoli were air or liquid filled before and after, respectively, alveolar microinjection. Table 1 shows the data
that generated a kappa of 0.934, indicating excellent
agreement between observers. Hence microcaliper measurements provided
dependable quantification of the state of alveolar liquid filling.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-36024, HL-64896, and HL-57556 (to J. Bhattacharya), and HL-10142 (to P. M. Wang).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Bhattacharya, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 10th Ave., New York, NY 10019 (E-mail: jb39{at}columbia.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 4 May 2001; accepted in final form 30 July 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Armitage P and Berry G. Further analysis of categorical data.
12.10 Kappa measurement of agreement. In: Statistical Methods in
Medical Research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, chapt. 12, 1994, p. 402-447.
2.
Ashino, Y,
Ying X,
Dobbs LG,
and
Bhattacharya J.
[Ca2+]i oscillations regulate type II cell exocytosis in the pulmonary alveolus.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
279:
L5-L13,
2000
3.
Clements, JA.
Pulmonary edema and permeability of alveolar membranes.
Arch Environ Health
2:
280-283,
1961.
4.
Crandall, ED,
and
Matthay MA.
Alveolar epithelial transport. Basic science to clinical medicine.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
163:
1021-1029,
2001
5.
Desplechain, C,
Foliguet B,
Barrat E,
Grignon G,
and
Touati F.
The pores of Kohn in pulmonary alveoli.
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir
19:
59-68,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Dobbs, LG,
Gonzales RF,
Marinari LA,
Mescher EJ,
and
Hawgood S.
The role of calcium in the secretion of surfactant by rat alveolar type II cells.
Biochim Biophys Acta
877:
305-313,
1986[Medline].
7.
Goerke, J,
and
Schurch S.
Mechanical properties of the alveolar surface.
In: The Lung: Scientific Foundations, edited by Crystal RG,
West JB,
Barnes PJ,
Cherniak NS,
and Weibel ER.. New York: Raven, 1991, p. 821-827.
8.
Hallen, T,
Ortmayr J,
Friedrich F,
Volkl H,
and
Dietl P.
Dynamics of surfactant release in alveolar type II cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
1579-1584,
1998
9.
Hildebran, JN,
Goerke J,
and
Clements JA.
Surfactant release in excised rat lung is stimulated by inflation.
J Appl Physiol
51:
905-910,
1981
10.
Hill, BA.
An alternative view of the role(s) of surfactant and the alveolar model.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1567-1583,
1999
11.
Kishikawa, T.
Study on the change of lung lamellar body to lattice tubular myelin by N-acetylglucosaminidase with special reference to membrane components and calcium.
J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol
24:
297-305,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Lai-Fook, S,
and
Beck KC.
Alveolar liquid pressure measured by micropipettes in isolated dog lung.
J Appl Physiol
53:
737-743,
1982
13.
Lehr, JL,
Butler LP,
Westerman PA,
Zatz SL,
and
Drazen JM.
Photographic measurement of pleural surface motion during lung oscillation.
J Appl Physiol
59:
623-633,
1985
14.
Mason, RJ,
and
Voelker DR.
Regulatory mechanism of surfactant secretion.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1408:
226-240,
1998[Medline].
15.
Otis, AB,
McKerrow CB,
Bartlett RA,
Mead J,
McIlrov MB,
Selverstone NJ,
and
Radford EP.
Mechanical factors in distribution of pulmonary ventilation.
J Appl Physiol
8:
427-443,
1956
16.
Schurch, S,
Goerke J,
and
Clements JA.
Direct determination of alveolar surface tension in excised lungs.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
73:
4698-4702,
1976
17.
Slutsky, AS.
Mechanical ventilation.
In: The Lung: Scientific Foundations, edited by Crystal RG,
West JB,
Barnes PJ,
Cherniak NS,
and Weibel ER.. New York: Raven, 1991, p. 2163-2174.
18.
Snashall, PD,
and
Chung KF.
Airway obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in left ventricular failure and mitral stenosis.
Am Rev Respir Dis
144:
945-956,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Staub, NC.
Pulmonary edema.
Physiol Rev
54:
678-811,
1974
20.
Staub, NC,
Nagano H,
and
Pearce ML.
Pulmonary edema in dogs, especially the sequence of fluid accumulation in lungs.
J Appl Physiol
22:
227-240,
1967
21.
Wirtz, HRW,
and
Dobbs LG.
Calcium mobilization and exocytosis after one mechanical stretch of lung epithelial cells.
Science
250:
1266-1269,
1990
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. U. Azeloglu, J. Bhattacharya, and K. D. Costa Atomic force microscope elastography reveals phenotypic differences in alveolar cell stiffness J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 652 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Perlman and J. Bhattacharya Alveolar expansion imaged by optical sectioning microscopy J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lindert, C. E. Perlman, K. Parthasarathi, and J. Bhattacharya Chloride-Dependent Secretion of Alveolar Wall Liquid Determined by Optical-Sectioning Microscopy Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2007; 36(6): 688 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Kuebler, K. Parthasarathi, J. Lindert, and J. Bhattacharya Real-time lung microscopy J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1255 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bhattacharya Alveolocapillary Cross-Talk: Giles F. Filley Lecture Chest, December 1, 2005; 128(6_suppl): 553S - 555S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Hastings, H. G. Folkesson, and M. A. Matthay Mechanisms of alveolar protein clearance in the intact lung Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): L679 - L689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Matthay, C. Clerici, and G. Saumon Lung Edema Clearance: 20 Years of Progress: Invited Review: Active fluid clearance from the distal air spaces of the lung J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1533 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Matthay, H. G. Folkesson, and C. Clerici Lung Epithelial Fluid Transport and the Resolution of Pulmonary Edema Physiol Rev, July 1, 2002; 82(3): 569 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O'Brodovich Pulmonary edema fluid movement within the lung Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): L1324 - L1326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Wang, E. Fujita, and J. Bhattacharya Mechanotransduction in the Lung: Vascular regulation of type II cell exocytosis Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): L912 - L916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |