|
|
||||||||
TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY
Acute Lung Injury
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Center, Tyler, Texas 75708; and 2School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0130
Submitted 15 August 2003 ; accepted in final form 30 December 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RIIa, is the receptor involved in cellular activation mediated by these complexes. Blockade of Fc
RIIa completely reverses activity of the complexes with the exception of chemotaxis. Both Fc
RIIa and IL-8 receptors mediate chemotactic activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, with Fc
RIIa being, however, a predominant receptor. Furthermore, activity of the complexes is partially dependent on the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases, i.e., ERK and p38, important components of the Fc
RIIa signaling cascade. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes may therefore be involved in the pathogenesis of lung inflammation in clinical acute lung injury. anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes in pulmonary edema fluid; neutrophils; IgG receptors; neutrophil activation; mitogen-activated protein kinases
IL-8, an important neutrophil activator (19), is responsible for
70% of the neutrophil chemotactic activity in fluids from lungs of patients with ALI, and its concentration correlates with the neutrophil content of the fluids (18). However, we have reported that a significant portion of IL-8 in lung fluids from patients at risk and patients with ALI is associated with anti-IL-8 autoantibodies (anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes) (1416), and BAL fluid concentrations of these complexes correlate with development and outcome of ALI (15, 16). Therefore, the primary objective of this work was to explore the hypothesis that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes have the capacity to trigger an inflammatory response in the lung and, if so, to delineate cellular and intercellular mechanisms that regulate activity of these complexes in vitro.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 mmHg and/or no clinical evidence of elevated left atrial pressure (29). Pulmonary edema fluid samples from patients with ALI (collected between 1990 and 1998) were obtained as previously described (30). Briefly, pulmonary edema fluid samples were obtained within 30 min of intubation and mechanical ventilation. A 14-French suction catheter (Becton-Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) was passed through the endotracheal tube and wedged into the distal airways. Then, edema fluid samples were suctioned gently through the inserted catheter. The samples were centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatants were stored at 70°C until use. Purification of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes and control antibody. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes were purified from either human plasma obtained from selected healthy donors or pulmonary edema fluids from patients with ALI. Both plasma and lung fluids contained the complexes as determined by a specific ELISA (see Measurement of concentration of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes) (1416). The samples were purified with a protein A/G column (Pierce) as routinely done by us and other researchers (14, 24, 25). In addition, complexes were formed between a monoclonal anti-IL-8 antibody and recombinant human IL-8 (rhIL-8) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and also a monoclonal anti-monocyte chemotactic peptide-1 (MCP-1) antibody (IgG1, R&D Systems) and rhMCP-1 (R&D Systems). These complexes were also purified with the A/G column. The monoclonal anti-IL-8 antibody was developed by Dr. Edward Leonard (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD) and is of IgG1 subclass as well (25). This antibody has similar properties to the anti-IL-8 autoantibody (12, 14, 25). Control antibodies were purified on the protein A/G column from normal human plasma or lung fluids that did not contain anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes as determined by the ELISA (see Measurement of concentration of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes) (14). Endotoxin was removed from the samples with Detoxi-Gel, and concentrations of endotoxin were measured in a Quantitative Chromogenic Lal assay (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). Endotoxin content was <100 pg/ml. This concentration does not evoke appreciable biological effects in studied cells.
Western blot analysis was performed to evaluate the purified samples (as routinely done in our laboratory) (13). Samples of purified complexes or control antibody were loaded into a 420% gradient SDS-PAGE gel, and separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked, and then the anti-IL-8 antibody was applied. Next, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. After that, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) were applied to the membrane. Then, the membrane was exposed to X-ray film (Fuji Super RX).
Measurement of concentration of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes were measured by an ELISA assay developed in our laboratory as previously described (14). Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates were coated with monoclonal anti-human IL-8 antibody. Then, the plates were incubated with samples followed by an HRP-conjugated antibody against human immunoglobulins.
Preparation of neutrophils. Human neutrophils from healthy volunteers were separated by dextran sedimentation and erythrocyte lysis by the method of Boyum (3).
Measurement of chemotactic activity of purified anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes toward human blood neutrophils (neutrophil chemotaxis).
Neutrophil chemotaxis was evaluated by the leading front method of Zigmond and Hirsch (32) as routinely done in our laboratory (14). Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, control antibody, IL-8 (rhIL-8, R&D Systems), or buffer (control) was placed in the lower well of a Boyden chamber. A 5-µm-pore-size, 100-µm-thick cellulose nitrate filter was placed on the surface, and the chamber was then assembled. A 200-µl aliquot of the neutrophil preparation (2 x 106 cells/ml) was added to the top of the filter and incubated at 37°C for 40 min. The filter was then fixed, stained, and mounted on a glass microscope slide. The leading front was determined by the distance that the leading two cells had moved through the filter. The measurements were made for five fields on three filters for each set of conditions. In some experiments the cells were preincubated with different concentrations of specific antibodies against IgG receptors {Fc
RIIa [IV.3; F(ab)] and Fc
RIII [3G8; F(ab)2]; Medarex, West Lebanon, NJ}, specific antibodies against IL-8 receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2, 50 µg/ml; R&D Systems), or anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody (10 µg/ml, R&D). A monoclonal antibody against Fc
RII [7.3, F(ab)2; Ancell, Bayport, MN], established to be equivalent to the IV.3 antibody, was used in the last series of experiments (as indicated) because the latter antibody was no longer available.
Competition between purified anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes and 125I-labeled rhIL-8 for binding to IL-8 receptors on neutrophils (binding studies). rhIL-8 (R&D Systems) was labeled with 125I as previously described (8). Binding studies were performed on neutrophils suspended in PBS containing 1% BSA. The cells (1 x 106) were incubated with 125I-labeled rhIL-8 in the presence or absence of different concentrations of unlabeled rhIL-8 or purified anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes for 90 min at 4°C to reach equilibrium and then centrifuged. The pellet ("bound" counts) and supernatant ("free" counts) were counted in a gamma radiation spectrometer (11, 14).
Measurement of the ability of purified anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes to trigger superoxide release from human blood neutrophils.
The generation of O2 was measured as the superoxide dismutase (SOD; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO)-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c (Cyt c; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) as previously described (20). Briefly, neutrophils (6 x 106 cells/ml) are incubated with cytochalasin B (10 µg/ml, Sigma) for 15 min at 37°C. After that the cells are incubated with different concentrations of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, control antibody, IL-8, or Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) in the presence of Cyt c for the additional 30 min (test samples). Parallel samples have SOD added before Cyt c (reference samples). The cells are pelleted by centrifugation, and O2 is quantified by changes of absorbance at 550 nm between test and reference samples. In some experiments, the cells were preincubated with specific antibodies against Fc
RIIa (50 µg/ml), specific antibodies against IL-8 receptors (50 µg/ml), or anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody (10 µg/ml).
Measurement of the ability of purified anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes to trigger neutrophil enzyme release (degranulation).
Neutrophil enzyme release was studied as routinely done in our laboratory (11). Briefly, neutrophils (6 x 106 cells/ml) are incubated with cytochalasin B (10 µg/ml, Sigma) for 15 min at 37°C. After that the cells are incubated with different concentrations of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, control antibody, IL-8, or HBSS for the additional 30 min. The cells are then centrifuged, and supernatants are removed. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is measured by determining the change in absorbance of tetramethyl benzidine (Sigma) at 450 nM in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Absorbances are read on a Titertek automated plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), and results are expressed as nanomoles of oxidized substrate. In some experiments, the cells were preincubated with specific antibodies against Fc
RIIa (50 µg/ml) or specific antibodies against IL-8 receptors (50 µg/ml) or anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody (10 µg/ml).
Characterization of the crucial components of the Fc
RIIa signaling pathway.
Before the above-described assays for evaluating activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes were performed, neutrophils were preincubated with specific inhibitors of different components of the Fc
RIIa signaling cascade {genistein (general inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, at 20 µM), PP2 (inhibitor of Src tyrosine kinase family, at 20 µM), piceatannol (Syk, at 20 µM), PD-98059 (ERK, at 20 µM), SB-203580 (p38, at 20 µM), wortmannin [phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-K), at 5 µM], U-73122 [phospholipases C
(PLC
), at 20 µM], and bisindolylmaleimide (BIM) [protein kinase C (PKC), at 20 µM]; Calbiochem}.
Evaluation of activation of p38, ERK, and Akt triggered by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (Western blot analysis). Western blot analysis was performed to detect specific elements of the signaling pathway (as routinely done in our laboratory) (13). After 2- or 5-min incubation with the samples (buffer, anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, or control antibody), neutrophils were lysed in SDS sample buffer [62.5 mM Tris·HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM DTT, and 0.01% bromphenol blue]. Then, the samples were heated to 95°C and were centrifuged to remove the cell debris, and supernatants were used for further analysis. Samples of lysed neutrophils were loaded into a 420% gradient SDS-PAGE gel, and separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked, and then the appropriate primary antibody (against phosphorylated or total p38, ERK, or Akt; Cell Signaling) was applied. Next, the membrane was incubated with an appropriate secondary antibody. After that ECL reagents (Perkin-Elmer Life Scientific) were applied to the membrane. Then, the membrane was exposed to X-ray film (Fuji Super RX).
Statistical analysis. Comparisons between groups were done using the Student's t-test, or the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test when the data sets were not normally distributed, and the Fisher's exact test. Results are presented as means ± SD. All statistics was performed with SIGMASTAT (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes and control antibody.
Western blot was performed to detect anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (Fig. 1). Samples of the complexes (lane 1) or control antibody (lane 2, both purified from pulmonary edema fluids from patients with ALI) were loaded into 420% gradient SDS-PAGE gels. After the electrophoresis, one gel was stained with Coomassie blue (Fig. 1A), and the second was subjected to electrophoretic transfer (to a nitrocellulose membrane). The membrane was incubated with the anti-IL-8 antibody followed by the secondary antibody and ECL reagents. Then, the membrane was exposed to X-ray film (Fig. 1B). As seen in Fig. 1A, both samples (lane 1, ICEF; lane 2, control antibody) contain equivalent amount of protein (IgG) with molecular weight of
160,000 (under nonreducing conditions). However, only purified complexes (ICEF) reacted with the anti-IL-8 antibody (Fig. 1B, lane 1). In addition, no free IL-8 was detected.
|
|
|
40% of binding.
|
29% reduction in the chemotactic activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes in the presence of these antibodies (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, it is well established that activity of immune complexes is primarily mediated by IgG receptors (27). In humans there are two types of IgG receptors (Fc
Rs) that bind immune complexes, Fc
RII and Fc
RIII, and neutrophils express Fc
RIIa and Fc
RIIIb (27). We used antibodies directed against Fc
RIIa [IV.3; F(ab)] and Fc
RIII [3G8; F(ab)2]. The latter antibody reacts with both Fc
RIIIa and Fc
RIIIb. Neutrophils were preincubated with the antibodies against Fc
RIIa [IV.3; F(ab)] and Fc
RIII [3G8; F(ab)2]. Only anti-Fc
RIIa antibody significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed chemotactic activity of human neutrophils (Fig. 4, A and B). About a 70% decline in the chemotactic activity was observed when neutrophils were preincubated with the antibody (Fig. 4, A and B). Data shown in Fig. 4B were generated from anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes that were purified from normal human plasma (ICP). Moreover, anti-IL-8 antibody did not affect chemotactic activity of the complexes (Fig. 4A). This antibody, however, completely abrogated neutrophil chemotaxis triggered by IL-8 (P < 0.05). Anti-CXCR antibodies were equally effective in inhibiting IL-8-induced chemotaxis of neutrophils (P < 0.05, Fig. 4A). To confirm that this activity was unique for anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, we prepared complexes between the monoclonal anti-IL-8 antibody and IL-8 and the monoclonal anti-MCP-1 antibody and MCP-1. Then, we compared the ability of these complexes to trigger neutrophil chemotaxis. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes but not anti-MCP-1:MCP-1 complexes exhibited chemotactic activity for human neutrophils when identical concentrations were used (0.5 x 1010 M) (Fig. 4C). The activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes was similar to that of purified complexes and was mediated by both IL-8 receptors and Fc
RIIa, whereas anti-IL-8 antibody had no effect, as was the case with purified complexes (compare Fig. 4, A with C). Anti-MCP-1:MCP-1 complexes, on the other hand, were chemotactic for neutrophils only at the concentration that was 10 times higher than the effective concentration of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (Fig. 4C). This activity was inhibited by the antibody against Fc
RIII but not by anti-Fc
RIIa (Fig. 4C).
Neutrophil activation triggered by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes.
Because anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes displayed chemotactic activity toward neutrophils, we next evaluated the effect of these complexes on neutrophil superoxide release and degranulation (MPO activity). As shown in Fig. 5, anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (ICP) triggered a respiratory burst of human blood neutrophils. The effect of the complexes (ICP) was significant (P < 0.05) and concentration dependent (Fig. 5). On the other hand, control antibody was not active (Fig. 5). Complexes purified from alveolar edema fluids from patients with ALI (ICEF) were equally effective in stimulating neutrophils when identical concentrations were used (8 nM) (compare Figs. 5 and 6). Furthermore, superoxide release induced by these complexes (ICEF) was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed by the anti-Fc
RIIa antibody but not by the combination of the antibodies against IL-8 receptors (anti-CXCR1 and anti-CXCR2) (Fig. 6). These antibodies, on the other hand, significantly inhibited IL-8-triggered superoxide release (P < 0.05, Fig. 6). MPO release was also significantly (P < 0.05) augmented by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (ICP) but not by control antibody (Fig. 7). Complexes from pulmonary edema fluids (ICEF) induced similar MPO release from human neutrophils when identical concentrations were used (8 nM) (compare Figs. 7 and 8). Anti-Fc
RIIa antibody substantially (P < 0.05) inhibited the MPO release induced by these complexes (ICEF), whereas the combination of the antibodies against IL-8 receptors (anti-CXCR1 and anti-CXCR2) had no effect (Fig. 8). The latter antibodies completely abrogated MPO release induced by IL-8 (P < 0.05, Fig. 8).
|
|
|
|
RIIa signaling pathway.
Because we determined that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes promote chemotaxis and activation of human neutrophils through Fc
RIIa, we wished to define which proteins of the Fc
RIIa signaling cascade are activated by the complexes. Although signaling through Fc
RIIa has been investigated to some extent, there are still many gaps in understanding of the precise sequence of the signaling events controlling neutrophil function, and most certainly nothing is known about the signaling mechanisms by which anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes stimulate neutrophils. We used the following inhibitors [of the proteins indicated in the signaling cascade initiated by the engagement of Fc
RIIa (1, 2, 21)]: genistein (general inhibitor of tyrosine kinases), PP2 (inhibitor of Src tyrosine kinase family), piceatannol (Syk), PD-98059 (ERK), SB-203580 (p38), wortmannin (PI 3-K), U-73122 (PLC
), and BIM (PKC). Then, neutrophil activation and chemotaxis induced by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes purified from alveolar edema fluids from patients with ALI (ICEF) were evaluated in the presence and absence of the specific inhibitors. Neutrophil respiratory burst was inhibited by genistein, PP2, PD-98059, wortmannin, and U-73122, whereas SB-203580 and BIM had no effect (Fig. 9), suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation as well as activation of a protein from Src tyrosine kinase family, ERK, PI3-K, and PLC
are evoked by Fc
RIIa engagement that leads to the respiratory burst triggered by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. In case of neutrophil degranulation, PD-98059 and U-73122 were not effective, but the inhibition was observed in the presence of genistein, PP2, piceatannol, SB-203580, U-0126, wortmannin, and BIM (Fig. 10). These results indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation along with activation of a protein from the Src tyrosine kinase family, Syk, p38, PI3-K, and PKC mediate neutrophil degranulation induced by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. Furthermore, the chemotactic activity of the complexes was measured in the presence or absence of the selected inhibitors. PP2 and SB-203580, as well as U-73122, significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, indicating that activation of a protein from the Src tyrosine kinase family, p38 as well as PLC
, is important for the chemotactic activity of the complexes (Fig. 11).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, we explored the hypothesis that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes may exhibit proinflammatory activity in vitro. There are only a few reports in the literature showing the ability of defined soluble immune complexes containing IgG to induce neutrophil chemotaxis (26) and trigger neutrophil respiratory burst and degranulation (28, 31). Thus the ability of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes to chemoattract and activate neutrophils was examined. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes displayed chemotactic activity for human neutrophils similar to that of free IL-8, whereas control complexes had negligible activity. It should be stressed that these complexes are extremely stable (25); therefore, the chemotactic activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes cannot be due to the free IL-8 that was released from the complexes. Furthermore, anti-IL-8 autoantibodies bind IL-8 with high affinity (
1012 M) (14). Neutrophils express specific receptors for IL-8 (19), and our data show that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes competed with 125I-rhIL-8 for binding to its receptors on human neutrophils. Previous studies by Sylvester et al. (25) indicate that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes cannot bind to IL-8 receptors on neutrophils. However, close analysis of the graph presented in that study reveals that there is concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of 125I-rhIL-8 to its receptors on neutrophils and that, at the highest complex concentration, 20% of the binding was suppressed (25). Furthermore, it is not possible to compare both studies directly, because the complexes were quantified by different methods (14, 25). Nevertheless, the previous study presents results (not conclusions) similar to ours. Perhaps the authors concluded that 20% of inhibition is too low to be significant, although statistical analysis of these data is not presented. Moreover, we may have used higher concentrations of the complexes.
We then explored the mechanism of activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. We found that blocking of IL-8 receptors inhibits
29% of chemotactic activity of the complexes but has no effect on the oxidative burst or degranulation of neutrophils that was induced by the complexes. IgG receptors that bind immune complexes, Fc
RIIa and Fc
RIIIb, are also present on the surface of neutrophils (27). When human neutrophils were preincubated with the antibody against Fc
RIIa or the antibody against Fc
RIIIb, only the former antibody significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed chemotactic activity of neutrophils. Moreover, the antibody against Fc
RIIa completely inhibited respiratory burst and enzyme release of neutrophils stimulated with anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. These results indicate that activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes toward neutrophils is primarily mediated by Fc
RIIa. It is known that soluble immune complexes of different size and composition are also capable of interacting with complement receptors (17). However, these in vitro experiments (chemotaxis, receptor binding, and neutrophil activation) were done in the absence of serum or other sources of complement, and in such conditions complement activation cannot occur (28). (We do not use serum because it contains immune complexes.)
In summary, our studies demonstrate that the IgG receptor Fc
RIIa is a predominant receptor involved in cellular activation mediated by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. However, the chemotactic activity of the complexes depends also on stimulation through IL-8 receptors. Furthermore, the facts that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes competed only for
40% of IL-8 binding sites on neutrophils (Fig. 3) and antibodies directed against IL-8 receptors suppressed as little as 29% of chemotactic activity of the complexes (Fig. 4) suggest that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes bind more readily to Fc
RIIa. That would explain why the activity of the complexes is primarily mediated by Fc
RIIa.
Finally, we determined which of the main proteins of the Fc
RIIa signaling cascade are activated by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. It has been established that the engagement of Fc
RIIa initiates a tyrosine kinase cascade dependent on the cytoplasmic tail of this receptor, which contains one copy of an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif, a substrate for phosphorylation by members of the Src tyrosine kinase family (Fig. 13). The phosphorylated immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif can bind to and activate Syk-tyrosine kinase, which subsequently activates a number of effector pathways (1, 7, 9, 10) (Fig. 13). Ultimately, neutrophil activation is initiated (10).
|
RIIa. However, the effect of soluble immune complexes was examined in only a few of these papers. Other triggers of Fc
RIIa activation differ in their ability to engage particular elements of this cascade. Zymosan, for example, behaves differently from immune complexes (9). Furthermore, even more importantly, activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes has never been studied before. Our goal was then to delineate the signaling pathways that are set in motion by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes.
Our results suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation, as well as activation of a protein from the Src tyrosine kinase family, Syk, ERK, PI3-K, and PLC
, is evoked by Fc
RIIa engagement, which leads to the respiratory burst triggered by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. On the other hand, tyrosine phosphorylation, along with activation of a protein from the Src tyrosine kinase family, Syk, p38, PI3-K, and PKC, mediates neutrophil degranulation induced by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. Furthermore, chemotactic activity of the complexes was measured in the presence or absence of the selected inhibitors. PP2 and SB-203580, as well as U-73122, significantly reduced the activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, indicating that activation of a protein from the Src tyrosine kinase family, p38, as well as PLC
, is important for the chemotactic activity of the complexes. Because Syk is not a part of the IL-8 signaling cascade (1), the facts that the inhibitor of Syk (piceatannol) had no effect on the chemotactic activity of the complexes but that SB-203580 (inhibitor of p38) significantly reduced the activity confirm the role of IL-8 receptors in mediating of chemotactic activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes. Figure 13 summarizes our findings.
The idea that immune complexes have the ability to activate neutrophils in pathological conditions is not new and, in fact, was explored already in the early 1980s (6). However, only recently it became clear that, depending upon its characteristics, such as size, composition, and reactivity with its complement system and Fc receptors, an immune complex may trigger diverse cellular responses (28). Soluble complexes differ substantially from insoluble counterparts, and, at least in the case of neutrophils, soluble immune complexes are able to activate only primed cells, whereas insoluble complexes do not require priming to display full activity toward neutrophils (20, 28). In contrast, anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes are not active in insoluble form (unpublished observations) and attract and stimulate unprimed neutrophils. Furthermore, different classes of Fc receptors are involved, i.e., either Fc
RIIa or Fc
RIII, or frequently both, according to complex type (28).
Our studies demonstrate that even though the IgG receptor Fc
RIIa is a predominant receptor involved in cellular activation mediated by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes, the chemotactic activity of the complexes depends also on stimulation through IL-8 receptors. That is because anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes can interact with IL-8 receptors as well (Fig. 4, A and C).
Furthermore, we show that anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes are also unique in another respect. Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (prepared with the anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody) but not anti-MCP-1:MCP-1 complexes exhibited chemotactic activity for human neutrophils when identical concentrations were used (0.5 x 1010 M) (Fig. 4C). The activity of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (prepared with the anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody) was similar to that of purified complexes and was mediated by both IL-8 receptors and Fc
RIIa, as it was the case with purified complexes (compare Fig. 4, A with C). Anti-MCP-1:MCP-1 complexes, on the other hand, were chemotactic for neutrophils only at the concentration that was 10 times higher than the effective concentration of anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (Fig. 4C). This activity was inhibited by the antibody against Fc
RIII but not by anti-Fc
RIIa (Fig. 4C). Anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes (prepared with the anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody) also induced neutrophil activation (as it was the case with purified complexes), whereas anti-MCP-1:MCP-1 complexes did not (data not shown).
Finally, little has been done to define effects of soluble immune complexes mediated through Fc
RIIa in human neutrophils, and the signaling cascade (due to Fc
RIIa engagement) activated by anti-IL-8:IL-8 complexes has never been studied before (1, 2, 7).
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-2-macroglobulin from patients with acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L1092L1098, 2002.
-2-macroglobulin. J Immunol Methods 270: 147153, 2002.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Parastatidis, L. Thomson, D. M. Fries, R. E. Moore, J. Tohyama, X. Fu, S. L. Hazen, H. F.G. Heijnen, M. K. Dennehy, D. C. Liebler, et al. Increased Protein Nitration Burden in the Atherosclerotic Lesions and Plasma of Apolipoprotein A-I Deficient Mice Circ. Res., August 17, 2007; 101(4): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fudala, A. Krupa, M. A. Matthay, T. C. Allen, and A. K. Kurdowska Anti-IL-8 autoantibody:IL-8 immune complexes suppress spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophils Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): L364 - L374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Reutershan, R. Stockton, A. Zarbock, G. W. Sullivan, D. Chang, D. Scott, M. A. Schwartz, and K. Ley Blocking p21-activated Kinase Reduces Lipopolysaccharide-induced Acute Lung Injury by Preventing Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Infiltration Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2007; 175(10): 1027 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Thomson, J. Christie, C. Vadseth, P. N. Lanken, X. Fu, S. L. Hazen, and H. Ischiropoulos Identification of Immunoglobulins that Recognize 3-Nitrotyrosine in Patients with Acute Lung Injury after Major Trauma Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2007; 36(2): 152 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Parsons Bridging the chasm between bench and bedside: translational research in acute lung injury Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): L1086 - L1087. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||