|
|
||||||||
1Divisions of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine and 2Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine; and 3Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted 16 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 16 September 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
extracellular matrix; signal transduction; gene transcription; lung injury; cyclic AMP; cAMP response element binding protein
The actions of adenosine are mediated through adenosine receptors belonging to the family of seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled cell-surface receptors. Adenosine receptors are expressed in many cell types including epithelial cells, mast cells, astrocytes, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts and have been classified into A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 (17, 28, 30, 34). The activation of adenosine receptors triggers a series of intracellular signals that modulate the expression of important soluble mediators such as IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, IL-8, and IL-6 (16, 25, 42, 48) and affects the function of both cation and anion channels in tissue epithelia (26, 40, 41, 44), among other processes.
In the lung, most of the extracellular adenosine is derived from the cleavage of AMP by the enzyme 5'-nucleotidase (32, 44). In addition to its role in modulation of transepithelial electrolyte transport, adenosine has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obstructive airway diseases like asthma, an airway disorder associated with airway wall remodeling and inflammation, and characterized physiologically by airway hyperreactivity and bronchoconstriction. The association between adenosine and asthma is derived from studies showing a three- to fourfold increase in adenosine in the alveolar lining fluid of patients with asthma compared with control (15). The cause of this increase remains unknown, but it may be related to the increased generation of adenosine resulting from release of ATP from injured airway cells. Of note, aerosolized adenosine triggers bronchospasm in patients with asthma and other obstructive lung diseases (12, 29, 33).
Recently, it was demonstrated that mice with a null mutation of adenosine deaminase, the enzyme that degrades adenosine, show increased levels of tissue adenosine that are associated with inflammation (5, 11). Of note, these changes were also associated with evidence of tissue remodeling as exemplified by alveolar enlargement, airway wall thickening, mucus metaplasia, and tissue fibrosis (6). These studies suggest that not only does adenosine affect inflammation, but it can also modulate tissue remodeling. In view of the potential importance of this phenomenon, we investigated the effects of adenosine on tissue remodeling as it relates to extracellular matrix expression. This work focuses on fibronectin, a matrix glycoprotein highly expressed in injured tissues that has been implicated in wound healing and repair (24, 39). Fibronectin is increased in the alveolar lining fluid of smokers and subjects with chronic obstructive lung disease (43, 47). In the asthmatic airway, fibronectin deposition is increased in the subepithelial layer (37). These studies suggest that fibronectin is a sensitive marker of tissue injury and a key component in airway wall remodeling. Herein, we demonstrate that adenosine stimulates the biosynthesis of fibronectin through adenosine receptor-mediated activation of protein kinases and the induction of fibronectin gene transcription in A549 lung epithelial carcinoma cells and primary alveolar type II cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture.
The human alveolar epithelial cell carcinoma line A549 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) was grown in DMEM (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 U/ml streptomycin and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Primary alveolar epithelial cells were isolated as previously described (14). These studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee. Briefly, rats were anesthetized, and a tracheostomy was placed followed by en bloc lung isolation. After buffer perfusion to remove intravascular blood elements, the lung airways were filled via the tracheostomy cannula with a solution containing porcine pancreatic elastase. The lung parenchyma was then cut away from the large airways and minced in a solution containing DNase and FBS (to terminate the elastase reaction). The minced lung was then successively filtered through 100- and 20-µm nylon mesh, and the recovered cells were plated onto 100-mm bacteriological plastic dishes that had been coated previously with rat IgG. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the nonadherent type II cells were gently aspirated from the plates. Cells obtained by this method contained
90% alveolar type II cells that were >90% viable by trypan blue exclusion. Alveolar epithelial cells (1 x 106 cells/ml) were resuspended in DMEM containing 10% serum and incubated at 37°C in 10% CO2.
Primary murine fibroblasts were obtained from transgenic mouse lung containing the full-length human fibronectin promoter connected to the luciferase reporter vector (45) by removing 3 mm of lung periphery and cutting the remaining lung parenchyma tissue into 1-mm sections. Tissue sections were washed three times in sterile PBS, resuspended in DMEM, and supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (100 U/ml penicillin G sodium, 100 U/ml streptomycin, 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B). All tissues were transferred to culture dishes and incubated in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 13 wk to allow fibroblasts to migrate out of tissue sections. Primary mouse lung fibroblasts were between two and eight passages when used in experiments. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion from four separate experiments.
The cells were incubated in complete serum-free media (Mediatech) for 24 h before being treated with adenosine. In inhibition experiments, cells were pretreated for 1 h with the following adenosine receptor antagonists: DMPX (10 µM), an A2A and A2B inhibitor, theophylline (10 µM), an A2B inhibitor, and MRS-1754 (10 µM), a specific A2B receptor antagonist. Cells were harvested and assayed for luminescence as described below.
mRNA analysis.
A549 cells (1 x 106 cells/ml) were plated onto six-well plates and incubated in complete serum-free media for 24 h before the addition of adenosine (10200 µM) for 16 h. Total RNA was isolated as previously described (31). The reverse transcription reactions of the extracted RNA were performed by combining the following reagents in a PCR reaction tube: 0.625 µM dNTP, 16 nmol random hexamer oligonucleotides (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), 5 µl First-Strand Buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 20 mM DTT, 200 units of reverse transcriptase enzyme, 0.5 µl RNasin (ribonuclease inhibitor; Promega, Madison, WI), and 1 µg extracted RNA in a total volume of 25 µl. Primers for PCR reactions were based on GenBank-published sequences and are as follows: human fibronectin forward primer (CCGTGGGCAACTCTGTC), reverse primer (TGCGGCAGTTGTCACAG); human
-actin forward primer (TGGAGAAAATCTGGCACC), reverse primer (TGAGGTAGTCAGTCAGGT); A1 purinergic receptor forward primer (GGGGCACTTGGACAGAAC), reverse primer (CCAGCGACACGATGAAGC); A2A purinergic receptor forward primer (TTCATGGAGTTTGCCCCT), reverse primer (TCTTG CTGGGCCTCATG); A2B purinergic receptor forward primer (TCTTCCTCGCCTGCTTC), reverse primer (AGCAGTGGGGGCAGAAC); A3 purinergic receptor forward primer (CTGTTGGGGTGCTGGTC), reverse primer (TGGCGCACATGACAACC). Reactions were performed using the following PCR protocol: 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min for 35 cycles. PCR products were resolved on 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide, band sizes were verified, and loading was controlled using the internal housekeeping gene
-actin.
Western blot analysis. A549 cells, rat type II lung epithelial cells, or primary lung fibroblasts (1 x 106 cells/ml) were treated with adenosine for 2448 h, washed with PBS, and lysed in 1 ml of homogenization buffer [100 nM Na3V04, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche Diagnostics), in PBS, pH 7.4]. The resulting homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (8). The protein (50 µg) was mixed with an equal volume of 2x sample buffer (125 mM Tris·HCl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 510% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.004% bromphenol blue), boiled for 5 min, loaded onto a 5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel with a 3.5% stacking gel, and electrophoresed for 2 h at 150 V. The separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose using a Bio-Rad Trans Blot semidry transfer apparatus for 1 h at 25 mA, blocked with Blotto [1x TBS (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl), 5% nonfat dry milk, 0.05% Tween 20] for 1 h at room temperature, and washed twice for 5 min with wash buffer (1x TBS and 0.05% Tween 20). Blots were incubated with a polyclonal antibody raised against human fibronectin (1:1,000 dilution) for 24 h at 4°C, washed three times for 5 min with wash buffer, and incubated with a secondary rabbit antibody raised against goat IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. Identically loaded blots used for loading controls were incubated with GAPDH (Abcam 9485; 1:4,000 dilution) primary antibodies. Blots were washed four times for 5 min in wash buffer, transferred to freshly made enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) for 1 min, and exposed to X-ray film. Protein bands were quantified by densitometric scanning using a GS-800 calibrated laser densitometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Immunofluorescence. A549 cells (5 x 104 cells/ml) were plated onto Labtek eight-well permavox slides. Cells were incubated in complete serum-free media for 24 h before treatment with adenosine. After a 48-h induction with adenosine, the media were removed and cells were fixed with warm 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min followed by immunofluorescence staining following a published procedure (38).
Measurement of cAMP. A549 cells (5 x 104 cells/ml) were incubated in complete serum-free media for 24 h before treatment with adenosine (100 µM) for 30 min and 1, 2, or 4 h. Cells were harvested, washed with PBS (120 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4), treated with 0.1 M HCl for 10 min, and centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 10 min. Cell supernatants were tested for cAMP by the use of a cAMP enzyme immunoassay kit (Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Examination of fibronectin gene transcription. To evaluate for fibronectin gene transcription, the pFN(1.2kb)LUC promoter construct (27) was introduced into A549 cells via electroporation. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS and added to PBS supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, to a final concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml. A549 cells were added to electroporation cuvettes (0.4-cm electrode gap) along with 40 µg of promoter construct plasmid DNA and 8 µg of pCL-neo mammalian expression vector (Promega) and subjected to 270 V and 950 µF (Gene Pulser II Electroporation System, Bio-Rad). Electroporated cells were pooled and plated into 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks, and neomycin phosphotransferyl gene-expressing cells were selected by the addition of 400 µg of Geneticin antibiotic (G418 sulfate; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for a minimum of 2 wk. To obtain individual clones, cells were serially diluted into 96-well tissue culture plates. Single colonies were subsequently tested for luciferase activity; for this, cells were incubated in complete serum-free media for 24 h before the addition of adenosine (0200 µM) for 024 h, harvested by cell scraper, washed with PBS, resuspended in 100 µl of cell lysis buffer (Promega), and sonicated, and a 20-µl aliquot was tested by adding 50 µl of Luciferase Assay Reagent (Promega). Light intensity was measured using a ThermoLabsystems Luminoskan Ascent microtiter plate luminometer. Results were recorded as normalized luciferase units and adjusted for total protein content that was measured using the Bradford method (8). On the basis of luciferase expression, one colony (HNR-9) was selected for all subsequent experiments.
Electrophoretic DNA mobility shift assay.
A549 cells (3 x 106) were seeded onto 150-mm2 tissue culture flasks and incubated in complete serum-free media for 24 h before the addition of adenosine (100 µM) for 16 h. Cells were washed, and nuclear binding proteins were extracted by a published method (13). Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (8). Double-stranded cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) oligonucleotide (5'-AGAGATTGCCTGACGTC AGAGAGCTAG) or AP-1 consensus oligonucleotide (5'-CgCTTgATgACTCAgCCggAA) was radiolabeled with [
-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase enzyme. Nuclear protein (5 µg) was incubated with radiolabeled CREB or AP-1 for 30 min at room temperature as described previously (35). For competition reactions, nonradiolabeled consensus and mutated CREB double-stranded oligonucleotides (5'-AGAGATTGCCTGTGGTCAGAGAGCTAG) or nonradiolabeled consensus and mutated AP-1 oligonucleotide (5'-CgCTTgATgACTTg gCCggAA) was added to the reaction mixture at 50x M concentration. DNA-protein complexes were separated on 6% native polyacrylamide gel for 23 h at 4°C at 10 V/cm. Gels were fixed, dried under vacuum, and exposed to X-ray film.
Statistical evaluation. Means ± SE were calculated for all experimental values. Significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Student's t-test. All experiments were repeated four to eight times.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Adenosine stimulates fibronectin expression in A549 via purinergic receptors. As reported by others, we found that A549 cells express several purinergic receptors including A1, A2A, and A2B; we failed to identify A3 receptors in these cells (44) (Fig. 3A). To determine whether one or more of these receptors mediated the effects of adenosine, A549 cells were cultured in the presence of several receptor antagonists. As shown in Fig. 3B, DMPX (A2A and A2B receptor antagonist) and theophylline (A2B receptor antagonist) diminished the stimulatory effect of adenosine on fibronectin expression. An A2B receptor-specific antagonist termed MRS-1754 also inhibited the effect (Fig. 3C).
|
|
Effects of adenosine on fibronectin expression in primary lung cells. To determine the relevance of our findings to lung cells, we harvested alveolar type II epithelial cells from rats and exposed them to adenosine as described above. This intervention stimulated the production of fibronectin protein as demonstrated by Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 5, A and B). We also tested primary lung fibroblasts isolated from mice transgenic with the full-length human fibronectin promoter connected to the luciferase reporter vector (45) and exposed them to adenosine. As observed for epithelial cells, adenosine stimulated the production of fibronectin protein in a dose-dependent manner in primary lung fibroblasts (Fig. 6A). Fibronectin gene transcription was also shown to be stimulated by adenosine in both a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 6, B and C).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fibronectin is highly expressed in injured lungs where it contributes to repair responses elicited by a number of injurious agents (24, 39). Fibronectin is found elevated and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obstructive lung diseases like asthma (9, 43, 47). Its expression in lung is stimulated by transforming growth factor-
1 and other growth factors present in serum (27, 36). Our work suggests that adenosine is yet another stimulant of fibronectin expression in lung cells.
Adenosine stimulated the expression of fibronectin mRNA and protein in A549 cells in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Adenosine induction of fibronectin mRNA was evident at 1 h followed by a peak at 4 h. Induction of fibronectin protein was evident at 48 h, which is consistent with observations made for fibronectin expression in other systems by this and other groups (27). Although the 10- and 50-µM concentrations of adenosine used in Fig. 1A did significantly increase the expression of the fibronectin mRNA, we found more variability in our results using these lower doses. The higher dose of adenosine (100 µM) resulted in more consistent results in all assays, including the fibronectin gene expression assay and fibronectin Western blot analysis. We did not experience any cytotoxicity, at least by cell growth and viability experiments, with the doses used. Another interesting observation relates to the fact that fibronectin mRNA accumulation diminished at higher concentrations of adenosine (200 µM). One explanation for this is that, at higher concentrations, adenosine may affect other pathways that provide signals that counter its stimulatory effect on fibronectin gene transcription. However, defining the mechanism responsible for this occurrence will require further investigation.
To determine the effects of adenosine on fibronectin gene transcription, we tested A549 cells stably transfected with a DNA construct containing the human fibronectin promoter connected to a luciferase reporter gene. These studies revealed that the stimulation of fibronectin expression by adenosine was at least partly related to an effect on gene transcription. Transient transfection of mammalian cells is a technique with inherent variability due to the passage number, growth phase, and confluence of the cells in addition to the purity and quality of the plasmid DNA. Although we found that the relative light units of each experiment varied, the same relative fold increase or decrease in fibronectin promoter activity compared with the untreated control cells was the same in all cases.
Adenosine has been shown to act through G protein-coupled receptors that transmit intracellular signals responsible for differential gene expression. Increased cAMP levels, activation of protein kinase A, and induction of specific transcription factors have been demonstrated (44). Similar signals appeared to be working in our system. We found that A549 cells treated with adenosine showed increased intracellular concentrations of cAMP and that treatment of the cells with H-89, an inhibitor of protein kinase A, blocked the stimulatory effect of adenosine on fibronectin expression in a dose-dependent fashion. We also found that adenosine induced DNA binding by CREB, a transcription factor known for its ability to stimulate fibronectin gene transcription (27). In contrast, adenosine had no effect on DNA binding by AP-1.
Others have shown that the adenosine-stimulated intracellular signals are mediated through purinergic receptors A1, A2A, A2B, or A3. We have confirmed the expression of three out of four of these receptors (A1, A2A, and A2B) in A549 cells and, consistent with their role in fibronectin induction by adenosine, we found that adenosine receptor antagonists prevented the stimulation of fibronectin. However, it should be highlighted that, in general, the methylxanthines and related compounds are weak adenosine receptor antagonists and may be nonselective. Furthermore, studies suggest that A1, A2A, and A3 receptors can be activated by physiological concentrations of adenosine, whereas pathophysiological concentrations of adenosine are required to activate the A2B receptor (20). Therefore, although the inhibition of the processes studied with MRS-1754, a more selective inhibitor for A2B, strongly suggests a role for this receptor in mediating the effects of adenosine on fibronectin expression, further work will be required to determine the true role of this receptor in vivo.
The extracellular concentration of adenosine is dependent on its production as well as on its metabolism by enzymes like adenosine deaminase, a purine catabolic enzyme that promotes its conversion to inosine (7). To test the effect of endogenous adenosine in the absence of metabolism, we treated the transfected A549 cells with an adenosine deaminase inhibitor. Cells treated with the inhibitor showed an increase in fibronectin gene transcription compared with control cells, suggesting that regulation of extracellular adenosine concentration through its metabolism might be needed to maintain homeostasis. This is consistent with other work demonstrating that mice deficient in adenosine deaminase show a sixfold increase in constitutive fibronectin expression (1). Interestingly, these animals show upregulation of a number of other extracellular matrix-related genes including those encoding for collagens, proteoglycans, laminin, thrombospondin, cathepsins, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, and the profibrotic growth factor transforming growth factor-
. Together, these findings suggest that adenosine is an important regulator of tissue remodeling and that conditions associated with increased adenosine release or decreased metabolism might promote fibronectin expression.
Finally, we confirmed that the findings obtained with A549 cells were relevant to primary lung epithelial cells. More intriguing were our findings that adenosine could stimulate fibronectin expression in fibroblasts, suggesting that adenosine could affect lung cells other than epithelial cells.
Implications for understanding tissue remodeling in lung disease.
Adenosine is generated in response to lung hypoxia and lung injury (32). Several studies have implicated adenosine in chronic lung diseases characterized by airflow limitation such as asthma (12, 15, 29, 33). However, the exact role of adenosine in vivo remains undefined. Its demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties suggest that it might have protective effects against tissue injury. However, its ability to stimulate mast cell degranulation, to activate eosinophils and other immune cells, and to induce cytokine expression in bronchial smooth muscle cells suggests that it might act to promote inflammation. The latter idea was strengthened by observations made in mice deficient in adenosine deaminase, an enzyme that, as stated above, serves to modulate levels of adenosine and deoxyadenosine in tissues and cells (5, 6, 11). The adenosine deaminase-deficient mice show accumulation of adenosine in the lungs and other organs. In the lungs of these animals, the concentration of adenosine was estimated to be
100 µM. This is comparable to the levels detected in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of subjects with asthma (15). These animals develop pulmonary inflammation as exemplified by increased mast cell degranulation and the accumulation of macrophages and eosinophils in lung. Most notably, and consistent with the theme of this report, they also develop evidence of tissue remodeling. These animals developed respiratory failure and died prematurely by 3 wk of age, but in animals with partial adenosine deaminase deficiency, the abnormalities developed gradually, ultimately resulting in accumulation of macrophages, the development of alveolitis and fibrosis in the distal airways, and death by 5 mo of age.
Together, these studies suggest that the release of adenosine and/or a decrease in its metabolism might result in excessive stimulation of purinergic receptor-dependent signals that induce the differential expression of genes involved in control of tissue inflammation and remodeling. Therefore, targeting the mechanisms responsible for poor control of adenosine levels or for aberrant signaling through adenosine receptors might help preserve tissue function. In this regard, purified adenosine deaminase covalently linked to polyethylene glycol has been shown to lower systemic and tissue levels of adenosine in both adenosine deaminase-deficient humans and animals (4, 18, 22).
In conclusion, further work with these and related agents will be required to understand the true role of adenosine in lung and to elucidate ways by which to control its actions.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene transcription, protein synthesis, and secretion in human monocytic cells. Immunology 95: 264267, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
stimulates the expression of fibronectin and of both subunits of the human fibronectin receptor by cultured human lung fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 263: 45864592, 1988.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Zhong, Y. Wu, L. Belardinelli, and D. Zeng A2B Adenosine Receptors Induce IL-19 from Bronchial Epithelial Cells, Resulting in TNF-{alpha} Increase Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2006; 35(5): 587 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Mora, E. Torres-Gonzalez, M. Rojas, C. Corredor, J. Ritzenthaler, J. Xu, J. Roman, K. Brigham, and A. Stecenko Activation of Alveolar Macrophages via the Alternative Pathway in Herpesvirus-Induced Lung Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2006; 35(4): 466 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |