AJP - Lung Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 292: L1-L3, 2007. First published August 18, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajplung.00275.2006
1040-0605/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/L1    most recent
00275.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G. L.

PERSPECTIVE

Bending and breaking the code: dynamic changes in promoter integrity may underlie a new mechanism regulating gene expression

Mark N. Gillespie1 and Glenn L. Wilson2

Departments of 1Pharmacology and Center for Lung Biology, and 2Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, Alabama

SINCE OUR FIRST BIOLOGY CLASS, we have learned that maintenance of DNA integrity is indispensable for the life of every mammalian cell. When DNA is damaged and the code cannot be properly deciphered, something significant invariably happens: mutation, evolution, disease (or at least "disease propensity"), senescence, etc. Not surprisingly, mammalian cells are endowed with complex and rather efficient surveillance mechanisms for detecting DNA damage and repairing such lesions with considerable precision. In what could be viewed as a final line of defense, changes in DNA integrity also trigger cell death pathways. Cells at risk for mutagenic events are thus eliminated before the organism suffers the consequences of having a constituent with a potentially defective genome. It seems to make good sense that the integrity of DNA is guarded at all costs.

Maybe not. There is mounting evidence that reversible alterations in genetic integrity may be a part of normal, day-to-day cellular operations. In a recent provocative report, Ju and colleagues (10) found in cultured MCF-7 cells that signal-dependent activation of gene transcription requires transient, topoisomerase IIbeta (Topo IIbeta)-mediated, site-specific formation of double strand (ds) breaks in DNA. In cultured pulmonary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cells, hypoxia and other signals reported to use reactive oxygen species (ROS) as second messengers have been shown to cause reversible oxidative base modifications in nuclear DNA (8, 16). Double strand DNA breaks and oxidative DNA "damage" associated with signaling! What for?

The dsDNA break discovered by Ju et al. (10) and findings of signaling-related oxidative base damage share a number of conspicuous features that may point to a common biological role. First, both kinds of "lesions" were detected in functionally significant regions of inducible genes. Using a clever adaptation of the ChIP assay, Ju et al. found dsDNA nicks in a hormone-responsive, nucleosome-associated promoter sequence of the pS2 gene. In terms of the VEGF gene hypoxic response element, we (8, 16) used ligation-mediated PCR to detect oxidative base modifications at nucleotide-resolution and found that the 3'-guanine of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 DNA binding sequence was most frequently targeted for oxidative modification in response to hypoxia and other stimuli using ROS as second messengers.

Second, multiple lines of evidence suggested that the lesions in both the pS2 and VEGF promoters somehow modulated gene expression. In both instances, changes in DNA integrity were temporally related to induction of gene expression. In the case of the pS2 promoter, Ju et al. (10) demonstrated that the Topo IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break served as a substrate for poly[adenosine diphosphate(ADP)-ribose]polymerase-1 (PARP-1) binding, which in turn was necessary for local chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation. In our studies, incorporation of a model abasic site at the hypoxia-modified guanine in an oligonucleotide sequence of the VEGF hypoxic response element was associated with increased HIF-1 binding and more robust hypoxia-induced reporter gene expression (16).

Another significant aspect of the Topo IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break and the ROS-mediated DNA base modification products is that they identify a long-sought functional connection between initiation of transcription with sensing and repair of DNA lesions. In the case of pS2 promoter activation, Topo IIbeta and PARP-1 are both well recognized for their involvement in the DNA damage and repair apparatus; in transcriptional activation, they play central roles by creating the dsDNA breaks, assembling other components of the transcriptional complex, and triggering localized loss of histone H1. With regard to VEGF expression, the bifunctional Ref-1/Ape1 is a key member of the hypoxia-inducible transcriptional complex (7, 15). The Ref-1 (redox effector factor) domain interacts with HIF-1 and other transcription factors and seems to be essential for their full transcriptional activity. The Ape1 domain, referring to apurinic-apyrimidinic endonuclease-1, functions in the second step of the base excision pathway repairing oxidative DNA damage (5).

Finally, both dsDNA breaks and base oxidation products cause prominent changes in the bendability and local sequence topology; this structural effect of DNA lesions also would be expected to impact fundamentally on transcriptional regulation. Promoter DNA is believed to wrap tightly around the histones comprising the nucleosome core particle, thus creating a steric obstacle to protein binding (6). During transcriptional activation, the promoter sequence must somehow become accessible to transcriptional proteins. Traditional concepts hold that chromatin remodeling factors are important for this process (6), but there is a chicken-and-egg situation inherent in this scenario: how do remodeling factors access the DNA and "relax" its association with the nucleosome if the DNA is wrapped so tightly that the remodeling factors themselves cannot gain access? Because short promoter sequences are believed to be relatively stiff (12, 14), it seems unlikely that transcriptional complexes, by themselves, impart sufficient energy to overcome the intrinsic rigidity of the DNA sequence, unwrapping it from the associated nucleosome. However, introduction of a dsDNA nick could serve to relax the DNA, while base oxidation products, such as 8-oxoguanine or its repair intermediate, an abasic site, introduce considerable tortional flexibility (1, 11). In this latter context, it is interesting that the hypoxia-modified guanine resides in the stiffest trinucleotide sequence of the VEGF hypoxic response element (16) where the incorporation of a "hinge" at this site in the form of a base oxidation product could be expected to have a dramatic effect on local sequence flexibility. Indeed, our preliminary observations indicate that incorporation of a single abasic site at the hypoxia-modified guanine engenders a remarkable degree of conformational flexibility upon nuclear protein binding (unpublished observations). The functional significance of these two different DNA structural changes, a dsDNA break and a base oxidation product, is thus similar; by changing mechanical properties of the promoter sequence, the modifications could enable DNA bending thereby reducing the steric obstruction to transcription factor binding.

These considerations suggest a new twist to current models of regulated gene expression (Fig. 1). With the use of DNA-cleaving enzymes or signaling-related ROS as tools, nature seems to dynamically impact the chemical integrity of local DNA sequences. The resulting change in DNA structure then facilitates or enables assembly of the transcriptional complex, including local chromatin remodeling factors, that serves to initiate gene expression.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Model for the postulated involvement of dynamic changes in DNA integrity in regulation of gene expression. A: in the "Off" state, promoter DNA is wrapped tightly around the nucleosome core particle, thereby sterically hindering the binding of transcription factors and cofactors. B: the introduction of a double strand DNA break via topoisomerase IIbeta and/or the reactive oxygen species-dependent introduction of a base modification product (indicated by the rectangle) changes local sequence topology and bendability in the vicinity of the nucleosome, thereby reducing the obstruction to transcription factor binding. C: assembly of the mature transcription factor complex, including chromatin remodeling factors, leads to dissociation of histones from promoter DNA and gene expression.

 
Could it be true that complicated, multicellular organisms intentionally create promoter damage to facilitate normal gene regulation? The answer is presently unknown. In the case of signaling-related dsDNA breaks, the occurrence of such lesions in circumstances more physiological than cultured cells has not been reported. In terms of ROS-mediated base damage, biomarker or histopathological evidence for the common base oxidation product, 8-oxoguanine, has been observed in a variety of settings, including diabetes (3, 13), coronary artery disease (4), renovascular hypertension (9), and primary pulmonary hypertension (2), to name just a few. It is not apparent, however, whether the DNA damage seen in these disorders is a toxic response to oxidative stress or whether the base oxidation products are, at least in part, associated with signaling pathways using ROS as second messengers.

There is another, perhaps more philosophical, reason to consider that DNA damage might be a normal part of gene regulation. It is a cornerstone of evolution that all species have a finite lifespan. The bending or breaking of DNA that appears to be linked to gene expression must entail some risk to genetic integrity. If these chemical alterations in DNA are not properly repaired or accommodated, we are left with a situation wherein the signals required for the normal function of living cells might ultimately provide the stimulus for their dysfunction, senescence, and death.

GRANTS

Studies from the authors' laboratories were supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants RO1-HL-058234, RO1-HL-073244, and PO1-HL-066299.

FOOTNOTES


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. N. Gillespie, Dept. of Pharmacology, Univ. of South Alabama College of Medicine, MSB 3366, Mobile, AL 36688–0002 (e-mail: mgillesp{at}jaguar1.usouthal.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

REFERENCES

  1. Ayadi L, Coulombeau C, Lavery R. The impact of abasic sites on DNA flexibility. J Biomol Struct Dyn 17: 645–653, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Bowers R, Cool C, Murphy RC, Tuder RM, Hopken MW, Flores SC, Voelkel NF. Oxidative stress in severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169: 764–769, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dandona P, Thusu K, Cook S, Snyder B, Makowski J, Armstrong D, Nicotera T. Oxidative damage to DNA in diabetes mellitus. Lancet 347: 444–445, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Demirbag R, Yilmaz R, Kocyigit A. Relationship between DNA damage, total antioxidant capacity and coronary artery disease. Mutat Res 570: 197–203, 2005.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Evans AR, Limp-Foster M, Kelley MR. Going APE over ref-1. Mutat Res 461: 83–108, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Felsenfeld G, Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 421: 448–453, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Gray MJ, Zhang J, Ellis LM, Semenza GL, Evans DB, Watowich SS, Gallick GE. HIF-1alpha, STAT3, CBP/p300 and Ref-1/APE are components of a transcriptional complex that regulates Src-dependent hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF in pancreatic and prostate carcinomas. Oncogene 24: 3110–3120, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Grishko V, Solomon M, Breit JF, Killilea DW, Ledoux SP, Wilson GL, Gillespie MN. Hypoxia promotes oxidative base modifications in the pulmonary artery endothelial cell VEGF gene. FASEB J 15: 1267–1269, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  9. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, Matsuura H, Oshima T, Chayama K. Endothelial function and oxidative stress in renovascular hypertension. N Engl J Med 346: 1954–1962, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ju BG, Lunyak VV, Perissi V, Garcia-Bassets I, Rose DW, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. A topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated dsDNAbreak required for regulated transcription. Science 312: 1798–1802, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rachofsky EL, Ross JB, Osman R. Conformation and dynamics of normal and damaged DNA. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 4: 675–706, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Shimada J, Yamakawa H. DNA-topoisomer analysis on the basis of the helical wormlike chain. Biopolymers 23: 853–857, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Xu GW, Yao QH, Weng QF, Su BL, Zhang X, Xiong JH. Study of urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage in diabetic nephropathy patients. J Pharm Biomed Anal 36: 101–104, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Zhang Y, Crothers DM. Statistical mechanics of sequence-dependent circular DNA and its application for DNA cyclization. Biophys J 84: 136–153, 2003.
  15. Ziel KA, Campbell CC, Wilson GL, Gillespie MN. Ref-1/Ape is critical for formation of the hypoxia-inducible transcriptional complex on the hypoxic response element of the rat pulmonary artery endothelial cell VEGF gene. FASEB J 18: 986–988, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ziel KA, Grishko V, Campbell CC, Breit JF, Wilson GL, Gillespie MN. Oxidants in signal transduction: impact on DNA integrity and gene expression. FASEB J 19: 387–394, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/L1    most recent
00275.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.