AJP - Lung Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (November 18, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajplung.00020.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/L685    most recent
00020.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, B.
Submitted on January 12, 2005
Accepted on November 15, 2005

Contribution of proliferation and DNA damage repair to alveolar epithelial type 2 cell recovery from hyperoxia

Jooeun Lee1, Raghava Reddy1, Lora Barsky1, Kenneth Weinberg1, and Barbara Driscoll2*

1 Department of Surgery and Developmental Biology Program and Division of Research Immunology/Bone Marrow Transplant, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 The Saban Institute for Research, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bdriscoll{at}chla.usc.edu.

In vivo hyperoxia exposure is a therapeutically relevant method for inducing lung injury that has been modeled in both rats and mice. In this study, C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to hyperoxia and allowed to recover in room air. The sub-lethal dose of hyperoxia for C57Bl/6J was 48 hours. Distal lung cellular isolates from treated animals were characterized as 98% epithelial, with minor fibroblast and endothelial cell contaminants. Cells were then verified as 95% pure AEC2 by Surfactant Protein-C (SP-C) expression. Following hyperoxia exposure in vivo, fresh, uncultured AEC2 were analyzed for proliferation by cell yield, cell cycle, PCNA expression and telomerase activity. DNA damage was assessed by TUNEL, while induction of DNA repair was evaluated by GADD 153 expression. A baseline level for proliferation and damage was observed in cells from control animals that did not alter significantly during acute hyperoxia exposure. However, a rise in these markers was observed 24 hours into recovery. Over 72 hours of recovery, markers for proliferation remained elevated, while those for DNA damage and repair peaked at 48 hours, then returned back to baseline. The expression of GADD 153 followed a distinct course, rising significantly during acute exposure and peaking at 48 hours recovery. These data demonstrate that in healthy, adult male C57Bl/6J mice, AEC2 proliferation, damage and repair follow separate courses during hyperoxia recovery and that both proliferation and efficient repair may be required to ensure AEC2 survival.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
D. Warburton, L. Perin, R. DeFilippo, S. Bellusci, W. Shi, and B. Driscoll
Stem/Progenitor Cells in Lung Development, Injury Repair, and Regeneration
Proceedings of the ATS, August 15, 2008; 5(6): 703 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. Pagano, I. Metrailler-Ruchonnet, M. Aurrand-Lions, M. Lucattelli, Y. Donati, and C. B. Argiroffo
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) controls lung cell proliferation and repair after hyperoxia-induced lung damage
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L619 - L629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.