AJP - Lung Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (September 12, 2003). doi:10.1152/ajplung.00053.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
286/1/L98    most recent
00053.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deleuze, V.
Right arrow Articles by Vargaftig, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deleuze, V.
Right arrow Articles by Vargaftig, B. B.
Submitted on February 25, 2003
Accepted on September 9, 2003

LPS-induced bronchial hyperreactivity : interference by mIL-10 differs according to site of delivery

Virginie Deleuze1, Jean Lefort2, Michel F. Bureau1*, Daniel Scherman1, and B. Boris Vargaftig2

1 94403, UMR 7001 CNRS/ENSCP/Aventis Pharma-Gencell S.A., 13 quai Jules Guesde, Vitry sur Seine, France
2 75015, Unite de Pharmacologie Cellulaire - Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Michel-Francis.Bureau{at}pharmacie.univ-paris5.fr.

When administered to mice systemically or via the airways, LPS induces bronchoconstriction (BC) and/or bronchopulmonary hyperreactivity (BHR), associated to inflammation. Accordingly, a relation between inflammation and allergic and non-allergic BHR can be hypothesized. We therefore studied the interference of the anti-inflammatory cytokine murine IL-10 (mIL-10) with LPS-induced lung inflammation, BC and BHR. mIL-10 was administered directly into the airways by intranasal instillation or generated in vivo after muscle electrotransfer of mIL-10-encoding plasmid. Electrotransfer led to high mIL-10 circulating levels for a longer time than after the injection of recombinant mIL-10 (rmIL-10). rmIL-10 administered intra-nasally reduced lung inflammation and BHR following LPS administration into airways. It also reduced the ex vivo production of TNF-{alpha} by LPS-stimulated lung tissue explants. Two days after electrotransfer, mIL-10 blood levels were elevated, but lung inflammation, BC and BHR persisted unaffected. Blood mIL-10 reaches the airways poorly, which probably accounts for the ineffectiveness of mIL-10-encoding plasmid electrotransfer. When LPS was aerosolized 15 days after electrotransfer, lung inflammation persisted but BHR was significantly reduced, an effect which may be related to the longer exposure of the relevant cells to mIL-10. The dissociation between inflammation and BHR indicates that both are not directly correlated. In conclusion, this study shows that mIL-10 is efficient against BHR when present in the airway compartment. Despite this, the muscle electrotransfer with mIL-10-encoding plasmid showed a protective effect against BHR after a delay of two weeks that should be further investigated.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.