| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
2 Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
3 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
4 Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: w.g.mclean{at}liv.ac.uk.
The adhesion of eosinophils to nerve cells and the subsequent release of eosinophil products may contribute to the pathogenesis of conditions such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. In this study we have separately examined the consequences of eosinophil adhesion and degranulation for nerve cell morphology and development. Eosinophils induced neurite retraction of cultured guinea-pig parasympathetic nerves and differentiated IMR32 cholinergic neuroblastoma cells. Inhibition of eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cells attenuated this retraction. Eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cells led to tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of nerve cell proteins, activation of p38 MAP kinase and generation of neuronal reactive oxygen species (ROS). Inhibition of tyrosine kinases with genistein prevented both the generation of ROS in the nerve cells and neurite retraction. The p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, SB239063, prevented neurite retraction but had no effect on the induction of ROS. Thus, eosinophils induced neurite retraction via two distinct pathways: by generation of tyrosine kinase-dependent ROS and by p38 MAP kinase. Eosinophils also prevented neurite outgrowth during differentiation of IMR32 cells. In contrast to their effect on neurite retraction, this effect was mimicked by medium containing products released from eosinophils and by eosinophil major basic protein. These results indicate that eosinophils modify the morphology of nerve cells by distinct mechanisms that involve adhesion and released proteins.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Durcan, R. W. Costello, W. G. McLean, J. Blusztajn, B. Madziar, A. G. Fenech, I. P. Hall, G. J. Gleich, L. McGarvey, and M.-T. Walsh Eosinophil-Mediated Cholinergic Nerve Remodeling Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 775 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. K. Morgan, R. W. Costello, N. Durcan, P. J. Kingham, G. J. Gleich, W. G. McLean, and M.-T. Walsh Diverse Effects of Eosinophil Cationic Granule Proteins on IMR-32 Nerve Cell Signaling and Survival Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2005; 33(2): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Curran, R. K. Morgan, P. J. Kingham, N. Durcan, W. G. McLean, M. T. Walsh, and R. W. Costello Mechanism of eosinophil induced signaling in cholinergic IMR-32 cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): L326 - L332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. K. Morgan, P. J. Kingham, M. T. Walsh, D. C. Curran, N. Durcan, W. G. McLean, and R. W. Costello Eosinophil Adhesion to Cholinergic IMR-32 Cells Protects against Induced Neuronal Apoptosis J. Immunol., November 15, 2004; 173(10): 5963 - 5970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-T. Walsh, D. R. Curran, P. J. Kingham, R. K. Morgan, N. Durcan, G. J. Gleich, W. G. McLean, and R. W. Costello Effect of Eosinophil Adhesion on Intracellular Signaling in Cholinergic Nerve Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2004; 30(3): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Sawatzky, P. J. Kingham, N. Durcan, W. G. McLean, and R. W. Costello Eosinophil-induced release of acetylcholine from differentiated cholinergic nerve cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): L1296 - L1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
