AJP - Lung Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (April 28, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajplung.00320.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/2/L281    most recent
00320.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J. Q
Right arrow Articles by Folz, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J. Q
Right arrow Articles by Folz, R. J.
Submitted on July 20, 2005
Accepted on March 1, 2006

A novel bronchial ring bioassay for the evaluation of small airway smooth muscle function in mice

John Q Liu1, Dennis Yang1, and Rodney J. Folz1*

1 Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rodney.folz{at}duke.edu.

Advances in our understanding of murine airway physiology have been hindered by the lack of suitable, ex vivo, small airway bioassay systems. In this study, we introduce a novel small murine airway bioassay system that permits the physiologic and pharmacologic study of intrapulmonary bronchial smooth muscle via a bronchial ring preparation utilizing bronchial ring (BR) segments as small as 200 µm in diameter. Using this ex vivo BR bioassay, we characterized small airway smooth muscle contraction and relaxation in the presence and absence of bronchial epithelium. In control BRs, the application of mechanical stretch is followed by spontaneous bronchial smooth muscle relaxation. BRs pre-treated with methacholine (MCh) partially attenuate this stretch-induced relaxation by as much as 42% compared to control. MCh elicited a dose-dependent bronchial constriction with a maximal tension (Emax) of 8.7 ± 0.2 mN at an EC50 of 0.33 ± 0.02 µM. In the presence of nifedipine, ryanodine, 2-APB and SKF-96365, Emax to MCh was significantly reduced. In epithelium denuded BRs, MCh-induced contraction was significantly enhanced to 11.4 ± 1.0 mN with an EC50 of 0.16 ± 0.04 µM (p<0.01). Substance P relaxed MCh pre-contracted BR by 62.1%; however, this bronchial relaxation effect was completely lost in epithelium-denuded BRs. Papaverine virtually abolished MCh-induced constriction in both epithelium-intact and epithelium-denuded bronchial smooth muscle. In conclusion, this study introduces a novel murine small airway BR bioassay that allows for the physiologic study of smooth muscle airway contractile responses that may aid in our understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.