Lung heparan sulfates modulate Kfc during increased vascular pressure: evidence for glycocalyx-mediated mechanotransduction

Randal O. Dull, Mark Cluff, Joseph Kingston, Denzil Hill, Haiyan Chen, Soeren Hoehne, Daniel T. Malleske, Rajwinederjit Kaur

Abstract

Lung endothelial cells respond to changes in vascular pressure through mechanotransduction pathways that alter barrier function via non-Starling mechanism(s). Components of the endothelial glycocalyx have been shown to participate in mechanotransduction in vitro and in systemic vessels, but the glycocalyx's role in mechanosensing and pulmonary barrier function has not been characterized. Mechanotransduction pathways may represent novel targets for therapeutic intervention during states of elevated pulmonary pressure such as acute heart failure, fluid overload, and mechanical ventilation. Our objective was to assess the effects of increasing vascular pressure on whole lung filtration coefficient (Kfc) and characterize the role of endothelial heparan sulfates in mediating mechanotransduction and associated increases in Kfc. Isolated perfused rat lung preparation was used to measure Kfc in response to changes in vascular pressure in combination with superimposed changes in airway pressure. The roles of heparan sulfates, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species were investigated. Increases in capillary pressure altered Kfc in a nonlinear relationship, suggesting non-Starling mechanism(s). nitro-l-arginine methyl ester and heparanase III attenuated the effects of increased capillary pressure on Kfc, demonstrating active mechanotransduction leading to barrier dysfunction. The nitric oxide (NO) donor S-nitrosoglutathione exacerbated pressure-mediated increase in Kfc. Ventilation strategies altered lung NO concentration and the Kfc response to increases in vascular pressure. This is the first study to demonstrate a role for the glycocalyx in whole lung mechanotransduction and has important implications in understanding the regulation of vascular permeability in the context of vascular pressure, fluid status, and ventilation strategies.

  • endothelium
  • pulmonary edema
  • permeability

the endothelial glycocalyx has been hypothesized to play a role in vascular barrier regulation through both passive and active mechanisms. Passive properties include the formation of a molecular filter overlying the cell-cell junction that limits water flux (2, 14) and protein flux (3, 38, 41) into the cell junction. Active barrier regulation occurs through mechanotransduction that alters junctional integrity via nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (15, 16, 18). Observations regarding glycocalyx-mediated signal transduction, however, have come from cultured endothelial cells and not from in vivo or ex vivo whole organ studies that would validate a physiological role for the glycocalyx in a more complex as well as clinically relevant model.

Recently, we reported that lung capillary endothelial cells, in vitro, respond to increases in hydrostatic pressure by production of intracellular NO and ROS that mediate barrier dysfunction manifested by an increase in hydraulic conductivity (15, 16, 18). Pressure-induced production of NO is a response characteristic of whole lung microvessels (24), clearly demonstrating that cultured endothelial cells and in situ pulmonary vessels share common responses to hemodynamic forces. We demonstrated that heparan sulfates (HS) were crucial for both the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and pressure-induced increase in permeability. The present study extends our observations from cell culture models (15, 16, 18, 24) to a physiologically and clinically relevant model; our results provide the first evidence for a role of the glycocalyx, specifically HS, in mechanotransduction and barrier regulation in the intact lung.

METHODS

Ex Vivo Lung Preparation

All animal experiments were approved by the University of Utah's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council).

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300–400 g) were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine (90:10 mg/kg), a tracheotomy was performed and they were mechanically ventilated with a pressure-controlled ventilator (Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT) at a respiratory rate of 60/min, FiO2 = 0.21 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 3.0 cmH2O. The chest and pericardial sac were sequentially opened and ligatures were placed around the aorta and pulmonary artery. Heparin (200 U) was injected into the pulmonary artery and allowed to circulate for 2 min. The rat was exsanguinated via transection of the abdominal aorta; the left atrium was cannulated via a left ventriculostomy. The pulmonary artery was cannulated via the right ventricle and lungs were perfused with Krebs-Ringer-bicarbonate solution containing 3% bovine serum albumin.

Pulmonary arterial (Ppa) and left atrial pressures (PLA) were measured continuously via in-line pressure transducers (P-75, Harvard Apparatus, Natick, MA) connected to an analog-to-digital board. Solenoids (20 PSI, 12 V DC, Cole Parmer; Mount Vernon, IL) were placed in-line on both the arterial and venous tubing and could be closed simultaneously for measuring double-occlusion pressures (Pdo). An in-line ultrasonic flow probe (Transonic, Ithaca, NY) was placed in the pulmonary artery cannula and flow data was recorded in real time. Lungs were suspended from a force transducer (Radnoti, Monrovia, CA) and lung weight was zeroed; lung weight, vascular pressures and flow were recorded using a custom-written program (LabVIEW, National Instruments, Austin, TX).

Reagents

Heparanase III (E.C. 4.2.2.8) was from Ibex Technologies (Montreal, QC, Canada); Krebs-Ringer buffer, nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), nitro-d-arginine methyl ester (d-NAME), S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), and diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO); Mn(III)-tetra(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin chloride (TBAP) was purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Bovine serum albumin fraction V was purchased from Proliant (Ankeny, IA). Anti-nitrotyrosine was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) and HSS-1 and 3G10 from US Biological (Swampscott, MA).

Calculation of Kfc

The change in lung weight expressed as milliliters of filtered fluid during the time interval from 18 to 20 min was divided by time (2 min) and then by the capillary pressure (Ppc), where Ppc = (Ppa + Pla)/2, yielding milliliters per minute per centimeter H2O (32); this value was normalized to 100 g of predicted lung weight (PLW), which was calculated from the equation PLW = 0.0053 (rat weight) − 0.48 (32).

Pressure-Volume Curves

Tidal volumes (Vt) in isolated perfused rat lungs during pressure-controlled ventilation were measured with a differential pressure transducer (DP-45, Validyne, Northridge, CA), driven by a Carrier Frequency Bridge Amplifier (type 677, Hugo Sachs Elektronik-Harvard Apparatus). Airflow (ml/s) was recorded with a custom-written program (LabVIEW 8.5, National Instruments, Austin, TX) at 200 Hz sampling rate, and each respiratory cycle was integrated to obtain Vt. A calibration curve was created by applying gas flow (air) (air pressure = 1 bar) from negative 16.16 ml/s (vacuum) to positive flow at 16.16 ml/s, through the DP-45 and recording the corresponding voltage output. This flow was regulated with a calibrated flowmeter (Dwyer, model UA1049) (accuracy ±2%) connected to a pressure regulator. The calibration curve was entered in a custom scale before recording of Vt. The lungs were ventilated with different peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) (ΔP = PIP−PEEP) to record the resulting Vt values. Flow/Vt was recorded for 1 min for each ΔP. We used inflation pressures that produced Vts identical to previous literature values (20, 33) during standard tidal volume (ST Vt). Low tidal volume ventilation (Low Vt) inflation pressures were chosen to recreate clinically relevant lung-protective strategies.

TISSUE NITRATE/NITRITE CONCENTRATIONS

Whole-lung protein preparations were assayed in triplicate for concentrations of nitrate/nitrite (NOx) using a chemiluminescence analyzer for NO detection (NOA 280i; Sievers Instruments, Boulder, CO) as previously described (27). Briefly, 50 μl of sample was injected into the reaction chamber containing a saturated solution of 0.05 M vanadium (III) chloride in 1 M HCl heated to 95°C to reduce NOx to NO. The liberated NO was carried in gas phase into the analyzer by a constant flow of helium gas. The analyzer was calibrated by using a standard curve derived from serial dilutions of a 0.1 M stock solution of sodium nitrite (NaNO2). Individual results for tissue NOx are expressed as micromoles of NO per micrograms total protein per Δ wet weight; the normalization to Δ wet weight is to correct for the dilution of NOx by increased extravascular lung water.

Immunohistochemistry

Lungs were perfused with neutral-buffered formalin via the pulmonary artery while Pla was held at 5 cmH2O; formalin was also instilled into the trachea at a pressure of 25 cmH2O. Lungs were processed by standard histological methods. Anti-NO-tyrosine, HSS-1, and 3G10 antibodies were conjugated to a biotin-labeled secondary antibody (IgM) and then incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Low Vt + double pressure step.

Lungs were ventilated at Low Vt and perfused for 20 min at isogravimetric pressure. Baseline Kfc (Kfc1) was determined by increasing left atrial pressure (Pla1) to 7.5 cmH2O for 20 min followed by a return to isogravimetric conditions for 20 min. A second pressure step (Pla2) to 7.5, 10, 12, and 15 cmH2O was performed for 20 min and Kfc2 was measured. The ratio Kfc2/Kfc1 was used to assess the influence of Pla on the filtration coefficient. Double-occlusion pressures (Pdo1, Pdo2, Pdo3) were measured before and after each pressure step to ensure stability of the individual preparation. The general scheme for the double-step protocol is shown in Fig. 1A, top and middle.

Fig. 1.

Experimental design. A: protocols 1 and 2 = low and standard (ST) tidal volume (Vt) ventilation, respectively, with 2 increases in left atrial pressure (Pla). Protocol 3 = Low Vt ventilation with a single increase in Pla. IG1 and IG2 = isogravimetric periods 1 and 2, respectively. Pdo, double-occlusion pressure; Kfc, filtration coefficient. Baseline Kfc1 was determined during step 1 at Pla, 7.5 cmH2O in protocols 1 and 2. During step 2, Pla2 was increased to 7.5, 10, 12, 15, or 17 cmH2O and Kfc2 was measured. The ratio of Kfc2/Kfc1 was used to assess the effect of increasing Pla on whole lung permeability. In protocol 3, lungs were exposed to a single increase in Pla from IG1 to Pla = 7.5 or 15 cmH2O. B: pressure-volume curves. Lungs were ventilated with either Low peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) [7–8 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 3 cmH2O] or ST PIP (10–12 cmH2O, PEEP = 3 cmH2O); airflow vs. time was integrated to derive Vt, which was normalized to rat body weight (kg). Pair, air pressure.

The double pressure step protocol was used for the following groups: control, l-NAME, TBAP, heparanase III, and GSNO. Test reagents were infused into pulmonary artery beginning 10 min into the second isogravimetric period and were present in the recirculating media for the remainder of the experiment. Test reagents were used at the following concentrations: l-NAME (200 μM), TBAP (200 μM), heparanase III (75 and 150 mIU/ml), and GSNO (500 μM).

Protocol 2: ST Vt + double pressure step protocol.

Lungs were ventilated with ST Vt, and Kfc was measured at baseline Pla = 7.5 cmH2O and after a second step of Pla to 15 or 17 cmH2O, as described above. Reagents were added to the perfusate beginning 10 min into isogravimetric period 2 and were present in the circulating media for the remainder of the experiment.

Protocol 3: low Vt + single-step protocols.

To examine the influence of the baseline Kfc measurement (initial pressure pulse) on subsequent Kfc measurements, we evaluated Kfc following a step from isogravimetric conditions to Pla = 7.5 or 15 cmH2O. Pdo values were measured before and after each pressure step. The Kfc obtained from ΔPla = 0 to 15 cmH2O was compared with Kfc2 obtained from the double pressure step protocol when Pla = 15 cmH2O. l-NAME (final concentration, 200 μM) was added to the media 10 min into the isogravimetric period and was present for the step increase in Pla to either 7.5 or 15 cmH2O. The general scheme for the single-step protocol is shown in Fig. 1A, bottom.

Statistics

All data are presented as box plots showing sample minimum and maximum, 25th and 75th percentile, and median. Differences between groups were assessed by ANOVA followed by either Tukey's honestly significant difference or Scheffé's post hoc test.

All statistical analyses were performed with Kaleidagraph for Windows (version 4.0.3), Synergy Software (Reading, PA); probability levels (P < 0.05) were taken to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Pulmonary Hemodynamics

We assessed pulmonary hemodynamics in all lungs (Table 1). As can be seen in Table 1, at any given Pla, measured Ppa, Ppc, and Pdo did not vary between groups. As expected, Ppa increased linearly as a function of elevated Pla. Ppa was not altered by l-NAME, d-NAME, TBAP, or heparanase III at any given Pla. Pulmonary capillary pressure, Ppc, [Ppc = (Ppa + Pla)/2], was not different across treatment groups when Pla = 15 or 17 cmH2O. Pulmonary artery Pdo1, Pdo2, and Pdo3 were not significantly different across groups at Pla = 15 or 17 cmH2O.

View this table:
Table 1.

Rat lung pulmonary hemodynamics

Lung Pressure-Volume Measurements

Pressure-controlled ventilation was used in the present experimental protocols; to quantify Vt delivered at net inflation pressure, we built a custom-made system to integrated airflow per unit time to derive Vt. The resulting pressure-Vt curve presents ΔP (PIP−PEEP) vs. Vt, normalized to body weight (kg) (Fig. 1B). In our Low Vt group, average Vts were in the range of 2.0–2.5 ml/breath; in the ST Vt group, Vt were 3.0–3.5 ml/breath. The Low Vt group was ventilated with 7–8 cmH2O providing a Vt per body weight of ∼4–6 ml/kg. The ST Vt groups were ventilated with 10–12 cmH2O yielding Vt per body weight of ∼6–8 ml/kg.

Low Vt Studies

Baseline Kfc.

All lungs in the double-step groups had a baseline measurement (Kfc1) at Pla1 = 7.5 cmH2O; thus Kfc1 for all groups was pooled and yielded an average Kfc1 = 0.081 ± 0.04 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g (n = 112). Subgroup analysis of baseline Kfc1 was compared between all control groups and no differences were noted. This rules out time- and technique-dependent factors that may have confounded subsequent Kfc comparisons. Pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa1), double-occlusion pressure (Pdo1), and capillary pressure (Ppc1) are denoted by a subscript “1” to indicate the baseline pressure step from which the measurement was derived.

Protocol 1: double pressure step.

The second step increase in Pla is designated Pla2, and the measured Kfc is denoted as Kfc2. Pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa2), double-occlusion pressure (Pdo2), and capillary pressure (Ppc2) are denoted by a subscript “2” to indicate the second pressure step from which the measurement was derived. The ratio of Kfc2/Kfc1 derived when Pla = 7.5 cmH2O for both pressure steps (C7–7) is considered “control” for the remainder of the studies. The control Kfc2/Kfc1 = 1.43 ± 0.78 (n = 8).

To characterize the influence of increased capillary pressure on Kfc, lungs were exposed to a second step increase in Pla2 to 10, 12, 15, or 17 cmH2O for 20 min. There was no significant difference in Kfc1, Kfc2, or Kfc2/Kfc1 when Pla = 7.5, 10, or 12 cmH2O. When Pla2 = 15 or 17 cmH2O, Kfc2 increased significantly compared with the baseline (Fig. 2A). At Pla2 = 15 cmH2O, Kfc2 = 0.65 ± 0.35 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g and the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio increased to 7.9 ± 3.27 (P < 0.01). At Pla = 17 cmH2O, Kfc2/Kfc1 = 9.86 ± 1.50 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g. The Kfc2/Kfc1 vs. Pla relationship is presented in Fig. 2A and shows nonlinear dynamics of the pressure vs. permeability relationship that cannot be explained by a simple Starling mechanism.

Fig. 2.

Effect of Pla on Kfc2/Kfc1. Group numbers represent the 2 values of Pla at which Kfc1 and Kfc2 were derived. All groups had baseline Kfc (Kfc1) assessed at Pla = 7 cmH2O. The second step in Pla was to 7, 10, 12, 15, or 17 cmH2O, corresponding to C7-7, C7-10, C7-12, C7-15, C7-17, respectively. The same group numbering system was used in nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME)-treated lungs. A: in control lungs (C) during Low Vt, baseline Kfc1 was measured at 7.5 cmH2O and Kfc2 was measured at 7.5, 10, 12, 15, or 17 cmH2O. The ratio of Kfc2/Kfc1 vs. Pla was constant at pressures over the range of 7.5 to 12 cmH2O. Kfc2/Kfc1 increased significantly when Pla2 = 15 cmH2O and 17 cmH2O; n = 8–13/group. B: l-NAME (LN, 200 μM) attenuated the increase in Kfc2/Kfc1 when Pla2 = 15 and 17 cmH2O; n = 6–10/group.

L-NAME.

Inhibition of endothelial NO synthase with l-NAME (200 μM) had no effect on pulmonary hemodynamics (Table 1) or on baseline Kfc2/Kfc1 (i.e., when Pla2 = 7.5 cmH2O) where l-NAME-treated lungs had a Kfc ratio of 1.68 ± 1.35 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g. l-NAME attenuated the increase in Kfc2 when Pla2 = 15 and 17 cmH2O (Fig. 2B). The Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O was 3.49 ± 1.40; when Pla = 17 cmH2O, Kfc2/Kfc1 was 3.70+0.88. These values are significantly different than untreated control (P < 0.05) as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. d-NAME (200 μM), the inactive enantiomer of l-NAME, had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc2 (data not shown). GSNO increased the mean Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio when Pla = 15 cmH2O to 9.1 (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Attenuation of lung mechanotransduction during Low Vt. Effect of heparanase III (Hep; 150 mIU/ml), l-NAME (200 μM), Mn(III)-tetra(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin chloride (TBAP; 200 μM), and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO; 500 μM) on Kfc2/Kfc1 when Pla = 15 cmH2O. Baseline Kfc1 ratio (C7–7) is shown for comparison. Heparanase III and l-NAME significantly reduced the increase in Kfc2 when Pla = 15 cmH2O. TBAP had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc2/Kfc1. GSNO increased mean Kfc2/Kfc1 to 9.06+3.26 vs. untreated lungs at Pla = 15 cmH2O (P < 0.0001). Experiments were performed during Low Vt ventilation; n = 8–9/group.

HEPARANASE III.

We tested two concentrations of heparanase III on pressure-mediated increases in Kfc. Heparanase III at 75 mIU/ml had no effect on Kfc relative to controls (data not shown). At a concentration of 150 mIU/ml, heparanase III had no effect on Kfc2 when Pla = 7.5 cmH2O, indicating that the enzyme did not alter baseline permeability, but heparanase III significantly attenuated the increase in Kfc2 when Pla2 was increased to 15 cmH2O (Hep7–15; Fig. 3). Heparanase III significantly reduced Kfc2 at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O to 0.134 ± 0.065 vs. 0.65 ± 0.36 in untreated lungs; the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio for heparanase III-treated lung was 3.10 ± 1.59 vs. 7.91 ± 3.28 in untreated lungs (n = 8, P < 0.0001).

TBAP.

The intracellular superoxide dismutase mimetic, TBAP (200 μM), had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc ratio when assessed at Pla = 15 cmH2O. TBAP at 200 μM is a high concentration and the duration of exposure was appropriate based on similar uses (25, 30). Kfc2 after a step to Pla2 = 15 cmH2O in TBAP-treated lungs was 0.63 ± 0.19 vs. control Kfc2 = 0.65 ± 0.36 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g; Kfc2/Kfc1 = 6.74 ± 1.58 was not significantly different than untreated lungs at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O (n = 9; p > 0.05) (Fig. 3).

ZONAL CHARACTERISTICS.

Kfc measurements are dependent on vascular surface area that can be increased by vascular recruitment; zonal characteristics (ZCs) were derived from ΔPpa/ΔPla as described by Brower et al. (10, 11) and Anglade et al. (7) and indicate the percentage of zone 2 and 3 conditions at each Pla. In control lungs, ZC significantly increased with the increase in Pla from 7.5 to 10 cmH2O (0.44 vs. 0.58; P < 0.05); additional increases in Pla above 12 cmH2O did not result in statistically significant changes in ZC (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.

Zonal characteristics (ZC) during increase in Pla. A: ZC was calculated at each Pla for control lungs and l-NAME-treated lungs at Low Vt. ZC increased significantly between Pla = 7.5 and 10 cmH2O but was not statistically changed when Pla > 12 cmH2O. l-NAME had no effect on ZC relative to controls at any given Pla. B: heparanase III (HepIII) and l-NAME had no effect on ZC at Pla = 15 cmH2O relative to untreated lungs. ZC analysis suggests recruitment was not influencing the affects of treatments (heparanase and l-NAME) on Kfc during elevated vascular pressure. Open circles represent outliers.

ZCs were derived for l-NAME-treated groups at Pla2 at 7.5, 10, 12, 15, and 17 cmH2O (Fig. 4A); increases in Pla from 7.5 to 10 cmH2O resulted in the only statistical difference in ZC. A comparison of ZC for control, heparanase III-treated, and l-NAME-treated lung at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O is shown in Fig. 4B. There were no significant differences in ZC between treatment groups at Pla = 15 cmH2O, suggesting that recruitment was not responsible for observed differences in Kfc when Pla2 = 15 cmH2O with heparanase and l-NAME.

INTERSTITIAL VOLUME.

To assess the effect of increased Pla2 and treatments (heparanase, l-NAME) on interstitial volume, we measured the retained lung weight after the second pressure steps (ΔVi) and normalized this value to predicted lung weight (PLW). A plot of ΔVi/PLW for each group demonstrates that heparanase III and l-NAME significantly reduced interstitial volume, in direct correlation with their effects the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Interstitial volume after elevated Pla during Low Vt. Retained lung weight after measurement of Kfc2 was used as a marker of interstitial volume (ΔVi) and normalized to the predicted lung weight (PLW). Heparanase III and l-NAME significantly reduced ΔVi/PLW, consistent with a reduction in vascular permeability.

Protocol 2: Standard Vt studies (ST Vt).

In this series of experiments, lungs were ventilated with PIP = 10–12 cmH2O, an increase in ∼30–40% increase relative to Low Vt experiments; the effect of Pla2 and test reagents (heparanase III, heparanase III + DEPC, l-NAME, d-NAME, GSNO) on Kfc were measured at Pla = 7.5, 15, and 17 cmH2O.

DOUBLE PRESSURE STEP.

All lungs in this group had baseline Kfc measured at Pla1 = 7. 5 cmH2O, followed by a second step increase to Pla2 = 15 or 17 cmH2O. At ST Vt baseline Kfc1 values were 0.078 ± 0.03 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g, which was not different from Kfc1 during Low Vt (Fig. 6A). At Pla2 = 15 cmH2O, the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio = 7.1 ± 2.71 (n = 12), which is significantly higher than the ratio obtained during Low Vt and Pla2 = 15 cmH2O. When Pla2 = 17 cmH2O, Kfc2/Kfc1 = 15.80 ± 1.20.

Fig. 6.

Effect of Vt on Kfc. A: Kfc1 was identical during Low Vt vs. ST Vt. B: at ST Vt, increasing Pla2 to 15 cmH2O significantly increased the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio compared with baseline (Pla = 7.5 cmH2O). Heparanase III (Hep7–15) significantly reduced the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio at Pla = 15 cmH2O; inactive heparanase [Hep7–15 + diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)] had no effect on Kfc2. l-NAME reduced Kfc2 by almost 50% during ST Vt and Pla = 15 cmH2O, but the decrease did not reach statistical significance. GSNO significantly increased Kfc2 when Pla = 15 cmH2O. C: increases in Pla to 17 cmH2O result in marked pulmonary edema that was significantly reduced by heparanase (Hep7–17) and l-NAME (LN7–17).

HEPARANASE III.

Heparanase III (150 mIU/ml) significantly reduced Kfc2 when Pla = 15 cmH2O; mean Kfc2 was 0.35 ± 0.21 and Kfc2/Kfc1 = 3.12 ± 1.93 (n = 12) (Fig. 6B). DEPC inhibits heparanase by binding to the histidine residue within the active site and renders the enzyme inactive (35a). This approach mitigates changes in enzyme structure that would be altered by boiling as a means of inactivation. Heparanase III was incubated with DEPC (100 nM; 20 min), then added to the circulating perfusate. In contrast to active enzyme, heparanase-DEPC had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc2/Kfc1 (Fig. 6B).

When Pla was increased to 17 cmH2O, Kfc2/Kfc1 increased to 15.8 from 4.08 (Fig. 6C).

Heparanase III significantly attenuated the increase in Kfc at Pla = 17 cmH2O (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6C).

L-NAME/D-NAME/GSNO.

We tested the effect of l-NAME (200 μM) and d-NAME (200 μM) on Kfc when Pla2 = 15 or 17 cmH2O. l-NAME significantly decreased Kfc2 when Pla2 = 15 and 17 cmH2O (Fig. 6, B and C). d-Name had no effect on Kfc (data not shown). GSNO significantly increased Kfc2/Kfc1, from 7.1 to 11.0 when Pla2 was increased to 15 cmH2O (P < 0.01, Fig. 6B).

ZONAL CHARACTERISTICS.

With ST Vt, ZC was 0.68, 0.79 and 0.79 at Pla2 = 7.5, 15, and 17 cmH2O, respectively; heparanase III and l-NAME had no effect on ZC (Fig. 7A and B).

Fig. 7.

ZC after elevated Pla with ST Vt. A: ZC was calculated at Pla = 15 cmH2O for control lungs (C7–15), heparanase III-treated (Hep7–15), and l-NAME-treated lungs (LN7–15). There was no difference in ZC between groups. Baseline ZC at Pla = 7.5 cmH2O (C7–7) is shown for comparison. B: ZC shown for controls (C7–7) and when Pla = 17 cmH2O (C7–17); heparanase and l-NAME had no effect on ZC at Pla = 17 cmH2O.

INTERSTITIAL MECHANICS.

To assess the effect of increased Pla2 and treatments (heparanase III, l-NAME) on interstitial mechanics, we measured the retained lung weight (ΔVi) after the second pressure step and normalized this value to PLW. Plots of ΔVi/PLW closely parallel the relationship of Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio between groups. There were no significant differences when Pla2 = 15 cmH2O between control, heparanase III-treated, or l-NAME-treated lungs (Fig. 8A). When Pla2 = 17 cmH2O, heparanase III and l-NAME significantly reduced ΔVi/PLW (Fig. 8B).

Fig. 8.

Interstitial volume after elevated Pla during ST Vt. Retained lung weight after measurement of Kfc2 was used as a marker of interstitial volume and normalized to the predicted lung weight. A: during ST Vt, heparanase III (Hep7–15) and l-NAME (LN7–15) had no effect on ΔVi/PLW compared with control lungs (C7–15). B: during ST Vt and Pla = 17 cmH2O, lung water increased significantly and was attenuated by both heparanase and l-NAME.

Protocol 3: single pressure step.

To assess the effect of the baseline pressure step (Pla1) on subsequent Kfc measurements (i.e., priming effect), we performed a single step from isogravimetric pressure (0–2 cmH2O) to Pla = 15 cmH2O. This group of experiments was performed in Low Vt lungs only. Kfc during the single pressure step to Pla = 15 cmH2O was 0.33 ± 0.16 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g and was significantly less than Kfc2 at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O in the double pressure pulse experiments (0.34 ± 0.16 vs. 0.65 ± 0.35 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g), Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Pressure-conditioning: single pressure step protocol. Lungs exposed to a single increase in Pla from isogravimetric conditions to 15 cmH2O (C0–15 cmH2O) had a Kfc significantly less than the Kfc derived from the double pressure step protocol at Pla2 = 15 cmH2O. Heparanase III and l-NAME reduced the single-step Kfc by 20–50%, but this reduction did not reach statistical significance.

Heparanase III reduced Kfc during the single pressure step to 0.29 ± 0.15 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g, compared with controls (0.33 ± 0.16 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g), although the effect did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 9).

l-NAME lower Kfc by 50%, compared with controls (in the single pressure step protocol. 0.13 ± 0.09 vs. 0.33 ± 0.16 ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g; p = 0.11) (Fig. 9). In fact, Kfc measured from l-NAME-treated lungs using the single pressure protocol at Pla = 15 cmH2O, was reduced by almost 50% compared with the corresponding Kfc2 from l-NAME-treated lungs during the double pressure pulse protocol (0.13 ± 0.09 vs. 0.23 ± 0.12, ml·min−1·cmH2O−1 per 100 g), respectively.

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY.

To validate the effects of heparanase III on removing lung HS, anti-HS antibody (HSS-1) was used to stain for HS. Control lungs demonstrate substantial capillary staining for HS within the alveolar septa (Fig. 10A); heparanase III completely abolished HS staining (Fig. 10B). An alternative approach to validate the efficacy of heparanase III was achieved by using 3G10, an antibody that recognizes the neoepitope on the HS chain generated by the activity of heparanase III. Control lungs showed no 3G10 staining whereas heparanase III -treated lungs showed significant staining (Fig. 10, C and D). Collectively, these two complementary approaches demonstrate significant removal of HS from the lung vasculature.

Fig. 10.

Immunohistochemistry of heparan sulfates. Lungs were immune-stained with anti-heparan sulfate antibody (HSS-1) for heparan sulfates. A: control lungs show significant vascular staining for heparan sulfates. B: heparanase abolishes all heparan sulfate staining, demonstrating removal of cell surface heparan sulfates. C: control lungs stained with 3G10, which recognizes the neoepitope created by heparanase. Note absence of neoepitope staining. D: heparanase treatment results in robust staining for neoepitope formation demonstrating activity of the enzyme.

Staining for nitrotyrosine was increased in lungs exposed to increased vascular pressure (Pla2 7.5 vs. 15 cmH2O) as shown in Fig. 11, A vs. B, respectively. During low vascular pressure (Pla2 = 7.5 cmH2O), small regions of positive staining are seen at low power (×20) and shown as a close-up (inset, ×60) (Fig. 11A). Following exposure to Pla2 = 15 cmH2O, an increase in nitrotyrosine staining is observed in both low- and high-powered images (Fig. 11B). Heparanase-treatment before increasing vascular pressure significantly reduced nitrotyrosine staining (Fig. 11C).

Fig. 11.

Immunohistochemistry for nitrotyrosine. A: control lungs at Pla = 7.5 cmH2O showed patchy staining. B: when lungs were exposed to Pla = 15 cmH2O, marked nitrotyrosine staining was evident. C: heparanase III treatment prior to increasing Pla attenuated nitrotyrosine staining.

TISSUE NOX.

We directly measured lung tissue NOx concentrations. The relationship between NO concentration vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 for pooled Low Vt and ST Vt are presented in Fig. 12A. The Low Vt group shows a statistically significant linear correlation between NOx vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 (r2 = 0.59, n = 29) and the Low Vt group is left shifted compared with the ST Vt group (inset). The combination of increased vascular pressure and ST Vt resulted in significantly higher tissue NOx concentrations; the NO vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 relationship was fitted to an exponential curve (r2 = 0.92); the permeability response was flat above an NOx concentration of ∼4 μmol.

Fig. 12.

Lung nitrate/nitrite (NOx) concentrations. NOx was measured in lung tissue following increased Pla. A: relationship of NOx concentration vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio for pooled Low Vt (LTV) and ST Vt (STV) data. Inset shows close up of relationship at low NOx concentrations; note linear correlation of Low Vt group vs. NOx and left shift of Low Vt vs. ST Vt group. B: during Low Vt ventilation, an increase in Pla from 7 to 15 cmH2O results in a 4-fold increase in tissue NOx. GSNO further increased tissue NOx levels when Pla = 15 cmH2O. Heparanase treatment at low Pla had no effect on NOx (Hep7–7) but significantly reduced NOx concentrations at Pla = 15 cmH2O, (Hep7–15). C: during ST Vt increases in Pla to 15 cmH2O result in large increases in NOx to 0.70; GSNO at Pla = 15 cmH2O further increased NOx to 2.60. When Pla = 17 cmH2O, NOx increased to 8.41; heparanase significantly reduced the NOx to 0.54, when Pla = 15 cmH2O (n = 4–6). m1–m4, fit parameters. Chisq, chi squared.

Tissue NOx levels are presented in Fig. 12, B and C. During Low Vt and baseline Pla (7.5 cmH2O), tissue NOx was low (0.028 ± 0.026 μmol) and increased almost 12-fold when vascular pressure was increased to 15 cmH2O (C7–15; mean NOx = 0.35 μmol; P < 0.01). GSNO increased tissue NOx levels to 0.70 μmol. Heparanase III treatment had no effect on NOx levels during baseline Pla (Hep7–7); during elevated vascular pressure, heparanase (Hep7–15) decreased the tissue NOx from 0.35 to 0.23 μmol (P > 0.05). NOx could not be measured in the l-NAME groups because l-NAME liberates NOx, which interferes with the assay.

During ST Vt, increasing vascular pressure resulted in an exponential increase in tissue NOx. Baseline NOx at Pla = 7.5 cmH2O (C7–7) was 0.03 μmol, which is identical to that of the Low Vt group. However, the combination of higher Vt and increasing in vascular pressure to 15 and 17 cmH2O resulted in marked increased NOx concentrations to 0.7 and 8.4 μmol, respectively (Fig. 12C). GSNO was synergistic with increasing Pla and increased NOx levels to 2.6 μmol. Heparanase III significantly attenuated the increase in NOx when Pla = 15 cmH2O to 0.5 μmol (P < 0.01, Fig. 12C).

DISCUSSION

The major findings of this study were 1) Kfc increased in a nonlinear relationship to vascular pressure, over the range of 7.5 to 17 cmH2O; 2) heparanase III significantly attenuated the pressure-induced increase in Kfc2 and inactivation of heparanase III by DEPC abolished its inhibitory effect; 3) l-NAME (200 μM) significantly attenuated the pressure-induced increase in Kfc2, whereas the NO donor GSNO increased permeability; 4) TBAP had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc2; and, finally, 5) the first step increase in Pla increased the sensitivity of the vasculature to the second step in Pla, a phenomenon we call pressure conditioning.

Nonlinear Relationship of Kfc vs. Pla

For our initial studies, we performed a detailed characterization of increasing Pla on Kfc. In these studies, Kfc1 was measured in all lungs at Pla1 = 7.5 cmH2O. After a second isogravimetric period, Pla2 was increased to 7.5, 10, 12, 15, or 17 cmH2O and Kfc2 was derived. In each set of experiments, the ratio of Kfc2/Kfc1 was calculated to establish the influence of Pla2 on whole lung permeability; the Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio did not significantly change until Pla2 = 15 cmH2O. The Kfc2/Kfc1 ratio following double pressure steps of 7.5/7.5, 7.5/10, 7.5/12, 7.5/15, and 7.5/17 was 1.43, 1.43, 2.83, 7.5, and 9.86, respectively. The nonlinear dynamics of the pressure vs. permeability relationship mimics what was observed in a cell culture model using lung capillary endothelial cells (15) and suggests a non-Starling mechanism. Kfc is the transvascular water flux normalized to capillary pressure and, therefore, assuming vascular permeability remained unaltered by pressure, the Kfc vs. Pla relationship should have a slope of zero. The nonlinear relationship, which has been reported in vitro, and now in a whole organ model, suggests a non-Starling mechanism consistent with active vascular mechanotransduction.

l-NAME had no effect on baseline Kfc1 but significantly attenuated the increase in Kfc2 when Pla2 = 15 and 17 cmH2O. These findings are similar to results obtained from monolayers of bovine lung capillary endothelial cells (15, 19, 43). The increase in hydrostatic pressure appears to activate eNOS, leading to an increase in endothelial permeability. The role of hydrostatic pressure and increased transendothelial flow on NO production has been reported by Burns et al. (12), using human umbilical vein endothelial cells as a model system. Thus there is a consistent finding both in vitro and now in an ex vivo lung preparation where pressure-mediated mechanotransduction involves eNOS activation and subsequent barrier dysfunction. GSNO, an NO donor, exacerbated pressure induced increase in Kfc during both Low Vt and ST Vt protocols, supporting the conclusion that NO is a mediator of lung endothelial barrier dysfunction.

Heparanase Experiments

This is the first study to demonstrate a role for vascular HS on mechanotransduction using a whole lung model. In the present study, heparanase III (E.C. 4.2.2.8) had no effect on baseline Kfc1 yet significantly attenuated the increase in Kfc2 when Pla2 was increased to 15 and 17 cmH2O (Figs. 3 and 6). These results are similar to our observations in vitro (15) strongly supporting the conclusion of glycocalyx-mediated mechanotransduction (26, 36, 42). We tested DEPC-inactivated heparanase III and found that it had no effect on reducing Kfc, during elevated vascular pressure; thus heparanase's enzymatic activity was required to attenuate mechanotransduction. To validate the removed of HS by heparanase, we performed immunohistochemistry and demonstrated nearly complete removal of vascular heparan staining after heparanase treatment. Likewise, the staining of heparanase-treated lungs by 3G10, an antibody that recognizes the neoepitope created by heparanase, demonstrated robust staining.

To determine whether heparanase's reduction in Kfc was actually due to a reduction in permeability and not due to altered interstitial pressure, we present the following line of reasoning. Negrini et al. (28) used intravascular heparanase III to induce lung injury in rabbits and reported an increase in interstitial pressure due to the accumulation of interstitial fluid. In their experiments, heparanase III-treated lungs had an increase in wet-to-dry weight ratio consistent with an increase in interstitial fluid. As interstitial pressure increased, the gradient for fluid flux decreased and, therefore, could reduce the apparent value of Kfc. In the present study, the increase in lung weight following each pressure step was taken as a marker for ΔVi (45); heparanase III-treated lungs had a significantly lower ΔVi/PLW at Pla = 15 and 17 cmH2O compared with controls (Figs. 5 and 8), consistent with a reduction in endothelial permeability and reduced interstitial edema. The significantly lower values for both Kfc and ΔVi/PLW in heparanase-treated lungs support the conclusion that mechanotransduction and increased permeability were attenuated by removal of vascular HS.

TBAP

TBAP is a cell-permeable superoxide dismutase mimetic that scavenges free radicals. We previously reported (15) that TBAP attenuated pressure-induced increases in endothelial permeability, suggesting that ROS were partially involved in barrier alterations. In the present study, TBAP had no effect on pressure-induced increase in Kfc. We conclude that ROS are not the cause of pressure-mediated barrier dysfunction in this ex vivo lung model.

Technical Considerations

The relationship between Pla, Ppc, and Kfc is complex and requires assumptions that have been addressed elsewhere (9). To rule out factors other than mechanotransduction that could have influenced measured Kfc, we address the following technical issues.

Pulmonary hemodynamics.

Ppa, pulmonary artery flow, and Pdo1, Pdo2, and Pdo3 were measured throughout the experiment. There were no significant differences in pulmonary hemodynamic variable that could explain the observed differences in Kfc2 when Pla2 = 15 or 17 cmH2O (Table 1).

Recruitment.

Fluid flux is dependent on vascular surface area; if step increases in Pla increased recruitment, our measured Kfc values may reflect only the increasing surface area and not an actual change in endothelial permeability. Short et al. (40) reported that, in rat lungs, recruitment of subpleural capillaries accurately reflected recruitment of interior capillaries; using similar methods, Presson et al. (35) showed that lung capillary recruitment was 90% complete when capillary pressure equaled 10 cmH2O and was nearly 100% complete when capillary pressure was 12 cmH2O. Pulmonary artery pressure is an indicator of downstream resistance and should decrease with increasing vascular recruitment. In the present study Ppa was stable after 3–5 min following the step increase in Pla, suggesting that recruitment and downstream resistance was not changing.

Evaluation of ZC (= ΔPpa/ΔPla) was undertaken to further evaluate the effects of increased Pla on vascular recruitment and to quantify the relative degree of Zone 2 and Zone 3 conditions throughout the experiments. During Low Vt experiments when Pla2 = 7.5 cmH2O, all lungs were primarily in Zone 2 as evidenced by ZC = 0.44. Increases in Pla2 to 10, 12, 15, and 17 cmH2O increased ZC to 0.58, 0.64, 0.71, and 0.76, respectively. According to ZC analysis, recruitment was completed when Pla = 12 cmH2O consistent with the finding of Presson et al. (35). In summary, Kfc continued to increase after ZC had plateaued, suggesting that changes in endothelial permeability as the cause for increased Kfc.

Mechanism of Pressure-Induced Increase in Kfc

Our results, using an intact lung model, demonstrate that permeability changes as a function of vascular pressure and are similar to mechanotransduction pathways elucidated with use of cultured endothelial cells (12, 15, 16, 18, 31). These findings challenge the Starling principle and demonstrate non-Starling mechanism(s) to account for the development of pulmonary edema. Enhanced staining of NO-tyrosine during increased vascular pressure and the reduction of NO-tyrosine after heparanase treatment strongly supports our hypothesis for a HS-eNOS mechanotransduction pathway. In fact, direct measurement of tissue NOx showed increasing tissue NOx with increased vascular pressure. Heparanase III reduced tissue NOx concentration by 50% when Pla = 15 cmH2O in the Low Vt groups and reduced NOx by eightfold, when Pla = 17 cmH2O, during ST Vt. Lastly, GSNO increased tissue NOx and significantly increased Kfc during elevated vascular pressure. Taken together, these results support our conclusion that NOx is involved in barrier dysfunction. A schematic for the proposed mechanism of glycocalyx mechanotransduction is shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 13.

Schematic of hypothesized role of glycocalyx in lung vascular mechanotransduction. Left: during static conditions, the glycocalyx maintains barrier function over the intercellular junction. Right: during increased vascular pressure, the increased hydraulic flow through the glycocalyx deforms or stresses the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) fibers, which in turn activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and leads to barrier dysfunction. ΔPc, change in capillary pressure; Q, flow; ZO-1 and ZO-2, zonula occludens-1 and -2; vin, vinculin, VE-Cad, vascular endothelial cadherin; ECM, extracellular matrix.

Kuebler (24) has shown that an increase in Pla increases lung capillary NO formation, consistent with the findings of our study. In fact, high vascular pressure has been shown to activate cytochrome P-450 (CYP450)-dependent pathways in the lung resulting in increased Kfc and metabolites of the CYP450 pathway, including 20-HETE, can activate eNOS in pulmonary endothelial cells (13). Experiments to elucidate the mechanism(s) linking the glycocalyx to eNOS activation and alterations in barrier function are currently underway in our laboratory. Stretch-activated transient receptor potential (TRP) channels likely participate in lung vascular mechanotransduction and have been shown to modulate both CYP450 pathways and eNOS activation (5, 21, 44).

Airway Pressures and Kfc

A major finding of the present study was the combined influence of airway pressure and Vt on tissue NOx and Kfc when vascular pressure was increased. At ST VT, baseline Kfc was not different than baseline Kfc at Low Vt (Fig. 6A), thus endothelial permeability is not altered by the changes in Vt when Pla < 15 cmH2O.

When lungs were ventilated with ST Vt and Pla was elevated, Kfc increased to a greater extent than when lungs were ventilated with Low Vt at elevated Pla. For example, at Low Vt and Pla = 17 cmH2O, Kfc2 increased ∼5-fold (Fig. 2) whereas at ST Vt and Pla = 17 cmH2O, Kfc2 increased ∼15-fold. Thus inflation pressure had a significant effect on the permeability response to increased vascular pressure.

Heparanase and l-NAME had a greater effect in the reduction of Kfc during ST Vt compared with Low Vt. These results cannot be explained by changes in vascular recruitment, since ZC did not change with heparanase or l-NAME treatments.

Yin et al. (47) demonstrated that in statically inflated lungs NO participates in a negative feedback loop, via a cGMP mechanism, that attenuates hydrostatic pulmonary edema. They suggest that elevated vascular pressure activates stretch-induced calcium channel opening (presumably TRPV4) resulting in eNOS activation, NO-stimulated soluble guanylate cyclase activity, and cGMP-mediated inactivation of TRPV4 channels. In their model, l-NAME exacerbated pressure-induced Kfc and NO donors attenuated pressure-induced increase in Kfc. The major difference that explains the results of Yin et al. Compared with the present work is the role of cyclic ventilation in maintaining endothelial cGMP levels. Lung cGMP levels are positively influenced by mechanical ventilation and nonventilated lungs show a significant reduction in cGMP levels (8, 22, 34). A complex interplay between endothelial cell cGMP concentrations and barrier function has recently been described by Pearse and colleagues (34, 37) and Kuebler (23), who demonstrated that cGMP concentrations increased in lung endothelial cells in a Vt- and time-dependent manner. This increase in cGMP stimulates the activity of PDE2A, an enzyme that degrades cyclic AMP, leading to barrier dysfunction and elevated Kfc. Support for this idea can be inferred from the findings of Parker and Ivey (32), who reported that high vascular pressure-induced permeability was attenuated with isoproterenol, a α-adrenergic agonist that increases intracellular cAMP.

Direct measurements of tissue NOx in lung samples from our study revealed differences in the NOx concentrations vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 relationship (Fig. 12) depending on Vt; the slope of NOx vs. Kfc2/Kfc1 was steeper and left shifted in the Low Vt group compared with the ST Vt group. This means that during low Vt, vascular permeability was greater at a given NOx concentration. During ST Vt there is a large increase in tissue NOx in response to elevated vascular pressure; this supports our conclusion that the combined effects of alveolar stretch and endothelial mechanotransduction result in more severe edema development.

NO can contribute to barrier dysfunction through mechanisms other than altering cGMP-to-cAMP ratios. For example, NO and its reactive metabolites such as peroxynitrite can directly nitrosylate tyrosine residues on endothelial proteins, resulting in barrier dysfunction. NO and ONOO-induced nitrosylation of β-actin are principal mechanisms of TNF-induced barrier dysfunction (29). Our immunohistochemistry data demonstrated an increase in NO-tyrosine staining in lungs subjected to increased Pla and, conversely, a reduction in NO-tyrosine in heparanase-treated lungs. Superoxide anions, produced via the activation of NAD(P)H oxidase (17) and mitochondrial oxidases (4, 39), can react with endogenous NO to generate peroxynitrites, leading to oxidative barrier dysfunction. The lack of effect of TBAP, an intracellular superoxide dismutase mimetic, suggests that ROS are not the primary mechanism underlying pressure-induced increase in Kfc.

NO can also nitrosylate and activate conductance of the TRP-family ion channels that allow calcium influx and sustain the calcium-dependent activation of eNOS (48). Cytoplasmic cys553 and cys558 can be S-nitrosylated and appear to account for the direct NO sensitivity of TRPC5, TRPV1, TRPV3, and TRPV4 channel gating. Other TRP family members including TRPC1 and TRPC4 possess conserved cys residues on the putative pore region that predicts NO-sensitive activation. The balance between cGMP gating of stretch activated channels as proposed by Yin et al. (47) and NO activation of TRP channel (48) has yet to be reconciled in the lung vasculature. Nitrosylation of TRP channels and subsequent calcium influx may lead to continued activation of eNOS and resultant barrier dysfunction.

Clinical Relevance

The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network data has demonstrated that low-Vt ventilation improves outcomes in patients with existing lung injury (1, 6), whereas conservative fluid strategies improve pulmonary function and reduce ventilator-free days (46). From a clinical perspective, lung vascular mechanotransduction may contribute to worsening extravascular lung water resulting from overaggressive fluid resuscitation in combination with elevated airway pressure and may help explain the beneficial mechanism(s) of conservative fluid management and low-Vt ventilation.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant 5R01HL085255-04 and the Presidential Endowed Chair in Anesthesiology to R. O. Dull.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: R.O.D. and D.T.M. conception and design of research; R.O.D. performed experiments; R.O.D., M.C., J.K., D.H., H.C., S.H., D.T.M., and R.K. analyzed data; R.O.D. interpreted results of experiments; R.O.D. drafted manuscript; R.O.D. and J.K. edited and revised manuscript; R.O.D. approved final version of manuscript; M.C., D.H., H.C., and S.H. prepared figures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to Ibex Technologies (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) for the generous gift of high-quality heparanase III for use in this study.

A special thanks to Drs. Kurt Albertine, Robert Lane, and Lisa Joss-Moore for helpful discussions during this work and manuscript preparation.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 35a.
  37. 36.
  38. 37.
  39. 38.
  40. 39.
  41. 40.
  42. 41.
  43. 42.
  44. 43.
  45. 44.
  46. 45.
  47. 46.
  48. 47.
  49. 48.
View Abstract